76 Comments
Aug 29, 2023Liked by The Constitutional Republic

Hi! Man Constitutional Republic. I like your work. I am involved in Maori Incorporation in NZ based on the Declaration of Independence 1835 under KinG William 1V and its terms and conditions in Ti Tiriti o Waitangi in 1840. I recently went onto a website: Gemstone University in America and the claims of a guy in there made me and enabled me to find your substack. I will ask you if you don't mind how I can research my own country of birth-England. I work here in NZ with the Nga Tikanga Maori Law Society as the Trustees of ''New Zealand'' is the English=The House of Lords and Privy Council. This has been hidden from NZ people. Thank you for your honest refreshing substack. The guy in Gemstone states that the world was put in debt under HJR 192 in 1933

Expand full comment

First--- this is NOT these united States. This IS in fact a corporation. The term you constantly mentioned was "conspiracy theory;" a term coined by an illegal Three Letter Agency. CIA or FBI. The configuration of power of law, is merely expressing the Double Headed Eagle heraldry seen from the old European Royalty---- Order of the Garter and Dragon Court.

So, here we can line up everything:

Republic of the US === the public front. Sold to everyone for acceptance and acquiescence.

Note: there is nothing wrong with an ideal, I agree with the US Constitution.

The Corporate UNITED STATES === the occulted or hidden source of authority and power.

Note: this is privately owned by dynastic bloodlines that trace their origin back to the end of the Roman Empire. The Corporate Franchise of the United States is operated from City of London.

These are individuals who claim Sovereignty over all governments; in a way, they are not wrong----- as I have done this very same thing, but I did it WITHOUT the adrenochrome and presumptuous claim of mastery over others.

In another note; when you are claiming that you are a US citizen, are you claiming that you are a piece of paper? Because THAT is what a citizen IS!

I have zero obligation to the government, PERIOD.

By the way, the term "Conspiracy Theory" is absolute bunch of BULL SHIT. People who pay attention to details should be rewarded--- not criticized.

As for the so called Rule of Law, just who the HELL IS THE RULER? who applies law? Are they subject to it also?

So, again when some dumbass asks: "Are you a US Citizen?" Are you going to say yes, I am a piece of paper. Or are you going to say I am currently "holding" a "US citizenship."

Never place your announcement of being: "I am" in front of a noun that describes a fiction at law.

I am Neferhotep--- Sovereign Regis

I offer obedience to nobody. Yet I stand with ALL who resist the Globalists --- Pedophile --- Elites. I defend life and innocence. Our children deserve better than the last 240 plus years of a false Republic.

Expand full comment
author

No its not... Your words dont make it true. Prove it

Expand full comment

What really proves it is whether or not we are willing to follow ILLEGAL FRAMEWORKS.... like vaccine mandates.

Trust is very fragile.... warp speed and EUA with private contracts with the DoD. Other Transaction Authority OTA to protect the pharma CORPORATIONS.

I DON'T NEED TO PROVE ANYTHING---- I CAN CONTROL MY OWN SENSE OF TRUST.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I can admire that you want the US Constitution to be properly applied in this country, we probably both see eye to eye there. If all we are arguing about is the way to get there, the constitution is a great bulwark in protecting the Sovereign Rights of Individuals.

By the way, I avoid drinking whiskey, when I write. I've noticed that a clear mind delivers a clear message.

Expand full comment
author
Aug 17, 2023·edited Aug 18, 2023Author

Well, good thing I'm not drinking whatsoever. I'm cold stone sober. I'm pissed man. I'm pissed dude Like it's time for people to wake up and I I'm glad that you At least respect the Constitution man, okay, but there can't be two how can there be two You can't be owned by the crown or the Vatican that's insane It's baffling so yeah, man, sorry, I mean

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
author

We are not in fact owned by London City and the Vatican. You're fucking out of your mind and you're absolutely ignorant to say the least. And it is impossible for you to provide evidence to support your argument because you lack intelligence. I am defending my country while you are making baseless claims against it. Just because I believe the United States is the best country in the world does not mean I condone its corruption. Another clue that you're completely fucking ignorant because you can't comprehend what people say because you're so full of your bullshit you can't even see the facts and truth. You don't even fucking spell right your punctuation's off You don't even know how to write It's tyranny is idiot is arguing what the fuck is that dude? LOL, Get the fuck out of here chump. I bet you're not even American, guaranteed. You have no evidence to support your desire for a monarchy to rule your country and are simply displaying your ignorance. I have contributed more to this country in a week than you have in your entire life. You are the one who is fraudulent and your comments are nonsensical. Please refrain from commenting when I am not present as you are clearly incapable of functioning on a higher level of consciousness. And I don't want to lose fucking brain cells looking at your comments. Posts one more time and I'm gonna fucking ban you from my sub stack, and you can go bitch about it somewhere else I don't care.

Expand full comment

We are born Sovereign, that can not be taken away. Through birth certificate trust, they try to steal your name and rights. The problem is, Sovereign rights can't be ceded to anyone. So that's why they created the corporate veil. They duplicate an identity. People, Money, Governments, and Land Titles.

There's no place for 3 letter agencies anywhere in the constitution.

I do get the sense that 17th is on the side of the constitution and I think he's saying that he hates corporations as we do, but the argument is more about HOW do we fix this? Somehow, some way we should come to a consensus as to what works best.

If the constitution is actually applied the way it should be, that would chop the size of the US government down to a postage stamp.

Expand full comment

the U.S. is a corporation it has a Dunn & bradstreet number along with 6,000 other "government" agencies underneath it. They overlayed a corporate structure on top of our constitution ..Therefore when u go to court u have to know what jurisdiction ur dealing with .. its all open source u can look up all the D&B numbers they are all de facto not de jure

Expand full comment
author

And what does that prove? Every local government has a Dunn's Bradstreet number and an EIN number. They have employees. They pay people. They collect taxes, dude. That doesn't prove anything. Again, more problems, no solutions.

Expand full comment

This government VIOLATED OUR TRUST. Dissolution is the solution. Decentralized communities are the only way to fix it.

Maybe really follow the US Constitution. There is nothing in there that actually allows three letter agencies to take our children away from us when we refuse to let them be indoctrinated in LGBT.

But they do it.

Expand full comment

it proves exactly what i said ..... and yes ur right every local government has a dunn and bradstreet number and thats the point ... it never used to be like that and thats the problem u wanna try and fix things within the system of systems . when in reality u have to get outside their system and operate in the common law ... nothing can be fixed within their defacto courts ... we have to set up our own common.law courts like we did here in johnson county texas , with our own judges and sheriffs ... thats action brother so dont talk to me about no solutions when all ur doin is tryin to operate within their system and fix it at the same time .. thats impossible .. do u even know how the courts work and how it has nothing to do with justice , but its all about money and bonds just like wall street , they create a cause of action then create a bond on that , hypothicate it and bundle that bond out the back where its sold, traded , etc. on the market .. go look at the GSA numbers and how much they rake in a month ... its 30 trillion a month that goes into that account from the court system ... and u think ur gonna facilitate change through local action within that system .. hell no one has to step outside their corrupt system and set up one that our founding fathers , fill those seats in govnmnt that each state left vacant , not try and oust the current regime in place ... it can be done we are doin it here in texas

Expand full comment
author

Whats your solution??

Expand full comment

SOLUTION : IS GO KENTETIC SO THE PEOPLE SEE A WAR THATS REAL ...BAR CLOWNS DRUG THRU THE STREET AS FOREIGN AGENTS THAT THEY ARE.... SHIT SHOW HAS GONE ON FAR TO LONG.

Expand full comment
author

yeah that's what I thought you're gonna say and that's the fucking dumbest thing I ever heard, do you got kids? do you got grandkids? have you ever fought in a fucking war?

so shut the fuck up with the war shit, especially when you haven't done a fucking thing to save your country on thbe local level. when was the last time you went to the polling station? when was the last time you went to a city council meeting? or whatever it is you got in your hometown, so get the fuck out of here with that, I knew that's what was coming. But guys, this isn't the time to be nice, man. Like, you guys are lost, and I'm telling you, you're lost. And there's gonna be a rude awakening. This guy, CSPOA, wants to go to fucking war. Are you kidding me? Question mark. Through the street as foreign agents that they are, shit has gone foreign. Shut the fuck up. War???

Expand full comment

SPOKEN LIKE A TRUE RETARD. YOU HAVE NO CLUE OF WHAT I HAVE DONE FOR THIS COUNTRY WHILE @ ONI ....

DO YOU KNOW WHAT THAT IS ? .. & YES SATHER IS A CLOWN PUPPET,

Expand full comment
author

You wouldn’t last 10 minutes in a kinetic situation. Your not fooling anyone. Can’t even spell the word. Lol. From the way you carry yourself and write, you haven’t done shit….

And you for sure are not ONI….

Furthermore, ONI isn’t combative. Meaning, you don’t “go kinetic.” They gather, analyze and disseminate intel in a safe area.

Your acting tough like you know what’s up is laughable.

Expand full comment

You did not happen to mention that the Federal Reserve is a private corporation to which Congress has delegated its Constituionally defined power of regulating the value of money. The IRS is also a private corporation (formed in the US territory of Puerto Rico no less) vested with the interpretation of its own tax code.

Expand full comment
author

So then you do agree that the US is not a corporation and we can move on to real problems? Because there's more problems than what you just mentioned that's for sure. A lot more.

Expand full comment

YA THE REAL PROBLEM IS WE HEARD IN 17' A SPECIAL MILITARY GROUP SET OUT TO " KILL " ... THE [ BAR ] & IN 21' THAT WAS DONE BUT........ THEY ARE SITTING ON THAT PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT FOR WHEN THIS SHIT SHOW IS OVER TO ANNOUNCE LIKE THE GRAND FINALLY @ JULY 4TH FIREWORKS SHOW IS TOTAL " SHIT SHOW" ....INNOCENT PEOPLE GET SCREWED IN THESE CORRUPT BAR CLOWN COURTS & SHOULDNT, 1/20/21' WHEN MILITARY LET AN UNELECTED RETARD TAKE A FAKE OATH OF OFFICE AS POTUS, MILITARY SHOULD HAVE GONE STRAIGHT MARSHAL LAW & SHUT DOWN COURTS IN THIS COUNTRY... BUT THEY DIDNT, ... WILL THE REAL WHITE HAT MILITARY PLEASE STAND UP !!

Expand full comment
author

All right, we had a little discussions, arguments, whatever, now I'm asking you guys. What is your solution? How do we solve this?

Expand full comment

No, I do not agree. I just happened to mention two other extra-Constitutional private corporations to which Congress has ceded its original Constitutional delegated powers. The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. is an extra Constitutional contrivance "funded" extra-Constitutionally with debt instruments (Federal Reserve Notes) for the purpose of expropriating and controlling the wealth of Americans through tax policy as enforced by the IRS - yet another extra-Constitutional private corporation, and for purposes of fielding bodies to fight the bankers' money and land grubbing wars. As long as we are living under the auspices of the CORPORATION we are inly perpetual debt slaves.

Break the Fed = Break the CORPORATION.

Expand full comment
author

So you think that the Constitution is not valid? You think it's incorporated, the Constitution?. You think some foreign entity somehow owns us? Why? Because our banking system is shitty? . So you don't follow U.S. law? Some weird law that kind of doesn't exist? Everything you're saying is half-true, man. There's an extra constitutional contrivance funded extra constitutionally with debt instruments. What? Dude, I mean, so what's your plan? Now what? Are you guys just complaining about stuff? Or what is your plan? How are you going to fix this? Because the military ain't going to do it, that's for sure.

Expand full comment

What problems? Let's send even more money to Ukraine 🇺🇦 Because Trump needs to help Israel, right?

Wasn't it Zelensky that said: Ukraine wants to be the Big Israel?"

Do you believe in the two party system?

Do you think that there is really a true fight between the right and the left?

Expand full comment
author

All right, we had a little discussions, arguments, whatever, now I'm asking you guys. What is your solution? How do we solve this?

Expand full comment

The real solution is to see what a Representative Republic actually means.

We watched how the Elections were stolen, how innocent Americans were imprisoned and still are for protesting the usurpation of our President in 2020.

Since then, we have watched the governing system of systems try to force everyone to take what I call Medical Countermeasures or MCM's for a fake virus. The actual list of violations the government committed against the citizens is really quite voluminous. A great resource for the Pseudo Legal Frameworks I mentioned can be found at Bailiwick News: https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/more-on-tower-of-basel-by-adam-lebor

There is plenty there to peruse if you wish.

My personal solution: is for establishing a localized decentralized community, based on self reliance, personal contact, barter and excluding ourselves from the "International Globalist Banking Structure." No CBDC's, no digital ID, and most important is affirmation of "Individualized Sovereignty."

The question we need to ask: Do we want a Compulsory Collective Society? or Do we want a Voluntary Cooperative one? We each need to make THAT choice. Once we do, then cooperation is essential for anything to work.

Expand full comment
author

Well, you should write a sub stack and detail that stuff out, man. Sounds like a plan. This is literally the first logical fucking thing I've read today in these comments.

Expand full comment

Didn't Pres. Trump move the Federal Reserve into/under the US Treasury back in 2018? He also filled all but 1 position on the Board of Directors, no?

Expand full comment
author

Yes, ma'am, I think you're right. But I just want to make it clear, I didn't put the Federal Reserve or the Treasury in my article to praise it by any means. It needs overhauling in a big way. But we can't because people are focused on these weird theories. So yeah.

Expand full comment

Trump commented on the Halper-Hayes "magnificent" presentation in the interview which was up-loaded by Don Jr.

You should watch it before you continue to comment.

I never called you a dumbass.

Some one else may, after reading your reply to me, but for the record, I did not call you a dumbass.

Military service is admirable. Both my boys are Marines.

Army, eh?

Expand full comment
author

All right, we had a little discussions, arguments, whatever, now I'm asking you guys. What is your solution? How do we solve this?

Expand full comment
author

Well, you know, it is what it is, so I don't have time for manners right now. Yeah, that doesn't prove that Trump agrees that the United States is a corporation. We have a lot of problems. I'm not saying we don't, but we're not a corporation. We're not owned by the crown. We're not owned by England. We're not owned by the Vatican. That's ridiculous. There's no mechanism for it. And look at you guys. It's distracting you guys. So excuse me if I say dumbass. And no, I'm not Marines or Army. I was Navy Special Warfare. So there you go.

Expand full comment

This is the first article that I disagree with you. The primary importance concerning the Federal Reserve is the ownership of the bank and the people who control the finances of the USA.

The IRS is completely and totally corrupt, unlawful, and unconstitutional.

You did great research in all of the wrong places.

Expand full comment
author

All right, we had a little discussions, arguments, whatever, now I'm asking you guys. What is your solution? How do we solve this?

Expand full comment

I've done a more shallow dive in this myself and seen that, yes, the organic act of 1871 was merely establishing city and county governments.

What lends evidence for incorporation is the existence of title 11 bankruptcy paperwork supposedly filed by Donald Trump.

And yet... When I looked up the United States Corporation by the same EIN, I found a current, operational corporation of the same name and same listed office address, not at all listed as dissolved.

Irregardless, I agree: we cannot do anything about incorporation, if it exists, on a local level. We -can- do things about elections, activities of local officials, etc.

I am intensely curious about the information alleged in Fruit from a Poisonous Tree, though: namely, that title 26 distinctly defines the vast majority of us as non-resident aliens who do not owe federal income taxes, but because we essentially lie about our status by signing our SS card and other contracts, we are stuck unless we go through and laboriously reverse contracts signed under When I read title 26, and the referenced SCOTUS cases, that certainly seems to be the case. I -do- know someone personally who has successfully challenged paying social security tax and won.

Expand full comment
author

Did you shallow dive that too? Because that doesn't go anywhere. That leads to the whole hill of nothingness. So if you do dig on it deeper, I would love to hear it. I would love anything. Prove me wrong, please. Although I don't want us to be a corporation like a lot of people in here do. I just don't get it. I'm not owned by anyone. I'm a free man. Our country has problems, but I still have pride. I still love my country and will serve it and die for it. People's lost that. It's ridiculous. I'm not, I'm just saying. I'm not taking it out on you, but I'm just fired up right now, man. Seven months. Research that long and tell me what you get. That would be awesome.

Expand full comment

I can see that. I'm sure you will reread what I said at some point and realize I was agreeing with you.

As far as the IRS is concerned:

Treasury Decision TD2313 and Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. Inc. (240 US 1): residents outside DC or the Territories of the US, are Non-Resident Aliens as regards Federal Income Taxes, as they are not citizens of the United States.

And... that is all, now... it seems 26 USC was updated last year, and the definition of United States was changed to now include the 50 States. I last researched this in mid-2021, and everything in the book checked out, back then. Literally, 26 USC stated in the definitions section, that the United States consisted only of DC, territories, and all land ceded to the federal government by the states.

All that said, the friend of mine who does not pay SS Taxes, this is what he did:

1)Do not do this after failing to pay taxes, do it while you are in good standing.

2)Anything can be challenged. If you challenge an organization demanding any act on your behalf, to show what law requires you to comply and they cannot, you owe them nothing.

3)He sent a written statement to the IRS, politely challenging their entitlement to SS tax, and demanding that they show what law requires him to pay it.

4)They responded with a document detailing IRS regulations, but no US code.

5)He responded, pointing out that regulations are internal regulations and do not have the force of law without a supporting law dictating such regulations, and repeated his demand that they cite the US Code requiring him to pay SS tax. After a month, he followed it up with a statement saying that, as they had not adequately shown a legal requirement for him to pay, he would not be paying from that date on.

6)The IRS has not responded, and he has not paid SS Tax in over a decade now. At any time, if they choose to, they can answer his challenge and require him to pay SS Tax, but until then, no penalties can be applied, as the challenge was made while in good standing, and was not responded to. This also means that accrual of SS benefits stopped when he stopped paying, of course, but at 15% of income for a self-employed individual, that money will provide a far better return invested in a retirement fund.

Expand full comment

You (or someone) wrote a substack that was generally thoughtful and well-written gramatically, but now in dialog with readers you stoop to a kind of knuckle dragging vernacular for some reason. Odd.

Trump's recent endorsement of statements made by Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes, that he terms to be a "masterpiece," who makes it a point to mention the now-defunct 1871 CORPORATION among other things having to do with devolution and COG holds far more weight than anything you (or someone) has written in the present blog.

"@realDonaldTrump: « Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes is fantastic. Everyone has got to watch her interview on election fraud with the poor sap who got taken apart by her. Thank you Don Jr. for putting this masterpiece out for the public to see. WITCH HUNT! »"

If you want to disagree with Trump, go right ahead. My guess is that he is far more informed on this topic than are you.

Here's 10 more minutes of research for you to better inform your position:

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/110845227764397486

Expand full comment
author

He commented on elections. Thats it.

Do you write?? Yeah, sorry you don't like the way I write in the comments, but I don't know if you write, but I got more time, I can think, I can articulate better. I like more freedom inside my comments so I can write how I want to write, dude. Like relax. And I am a knuckle-dragger, bro. I'm a combat veteran, and I'm proud of it, man. Proud of it. We did some crazy shit. Yeah, like IEDs and shit, like at your feet, you know, that type of stuff. And honestly, I'm fired up right now that you guys are just still drinking the Kool-Aid. I guarantee you didn't read this article Okay, if you did then you guys don't believe in the Constitution or you think it's fake and that is a fucking drift That's a psyop that you guys fell for How could you not see it? Am I I'm the dumbass right? Yeah, I'm the dumbass. Yeah, I'm fired up because here you guys are telling me that you're basically not going to vote, which means Trump isn't going to win, which means why are you fucking here? Honestly, I'm pissed too, man. You guys got stooped.

Expand full comment

LOOKS LIKE SOMETHING WAS MISSED 🤔... FREEMASON / BAR CLOWNS CHANGED 1 WORD THAT YES MADE 2 CONSTITUTIONS.... " OF " & " FOR " ... OUR WHOLE JUSTICE & COURT SYSTEM IS A JOKE, KANGAROO COURT SET UP BY TREASONOUS BAR CLOWNS, WHO FLY A GOLD FRINGE FLAG.. ACT OF 1871' ... DID CHANGE THIS COUNTRY .

Expand full comment
author

No, I didn't miss anything, man. You guys just want to pile up a bunch of problems that can't be solved. Freemason, bar clowns, change. One word that, yes, made two constitutions, where's the second one at? Question mark. Where's the second one? Is it a joke? How do you know? Have you been in there? What have you done to it? Have you even tried anything? What's your plan? What's your plan for all this? You're just going to make a bunch of problems and not do nothing? Come on, guys. This is it? None of what you're saying can be proven. Show me, because I researched the shit out of this. You guys are wrong. The Constitution cannot be incorporated. District of Columbia was a fucking municipal corporation, which is a local government, by definition, by law. If you don't believe in our law, what the fuck are you doing here? Move, because you guys are just dead weight at this point.

Expand full comment

THE BAR CAN BE SHUT DOWN !!

Expand full comment
author

What bar? What bar are you talking about? The one you go drinking at the end of your street? What bar?

Expand full comment

BAR let's break it down to see it.

British

Administrative

Registrant

Prior to that an attorney was known as a Satan of the court.

Hmm...

Expand full comment
author
Aug 17, 2023·edited Aug 17, 2023Author

Google search, dude, it took me five minutes, okay? Watch. Just watch. That's the first piece of information I found on that stupid name you just had there.

Where is it?? It does not exist. See, I don't buy your bullshit, dude. I don't just take words for it. I fucking look and I research, okay? I research. Look at the first link genius...

https://bar-registrars.org/about-us

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/professions-regulated-by-law-in-the-uk-and-their-regulators/uk-regulated-professions-and-their-regulators

https://www.gov.uk/general-register-office

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Register_Office_for_England_and_Wales

here's what bar really fucking stands for and yeah I'm being rude now because you're being lazy, you're just spewing out shit you're playing the Christian card saying everything's satanist it's bullshit beta.

In law, the bar is the legal profession as an institution. The term is a metonym for the line that separates the parts of a courtroom reserved for spectators and those reserved for participants in a trial such as lawyers. In the United Kingdom, the term "the Bar" refers only to the professional organization for barristers; the other type of UK lawyer, solicitors, have their own body, the Law Society. Correspondingly, being "called to the Bar" refers to admission to the profession of barristers, not solicitors. In law, the bar is the legal profession as an institution. The term is a antonym for the line that separates the parts of a courtroom reserved for spectators and those reserved for participants in a trial such as lawyers. In the United Kingdom, the term "the Bar" refers only to the professional organization for barristers; the other type of UK lawyer, solicitors, have their own body, the Law Society. Correspondingly, being "called to the Bar" refers to admission to the profession of barristers, not solicitors

https://www.uscourts.gov/rules-policies/about-rulemaking-process/how-rulemaking-process-works/overview-bench-bar-and-public

Thats what the BAR is.

Mic drop.

Expand full comment

YOU SOUND LIKE THAT CIA IDIOT JORDAN SATHER ? .... ALL THIS CRAP DONE UNDER 17TH SOG ? ...WHAT A JOKE

Expand full comment
author

Yeah, man, I don't care what I sound like and I don't care what you think is a joke because you're the idiot that wants to go to war. So in Jordan Sather, dude, you are way off base, bro. Way off. That guy couldn't find himself out of a wet paper bag. And you think he's CIA? Are you kidding me? So, yeah, I'm not being nice today, sorry, because this has gone on for long enough. You guys are just, none of you can answer what the solution is.

Expand full comment

There might be a link historically between NZ/Aotearoa and America through the link of Hawaii. Ewan has unravelled many links and the Catholic Church is involved with its Nuncious-Canon law dudes who work for the business arm of Church.

Expand full comment

I suggest, not instruct to have a look at a book: Who Is The Government by Ewan Campbell. He is a specialist in Farming in NZ and was put in prison some years back on trumped up charges by Fertiliser companies and the Commerce Commission of so-called NZ gov. There is an intro online. I am not the author and do not receive any commission for writing this. We dont know who the gov. or so-called gov. is in NZ. These ''settlers'' came out of the Penatentaries of NSW in Australia in 1800s. Look up Hohepa Marpiria- he entered Grays Inn law school in London and got on the inside. He did not cross the Bar.

Expand full comment

Tactical Civics is a good solution.

It teaches you how the Constitution is suppose to work.

We the People is suppose to be in control.

Look it up!

Expand full comment

This Constitutional Republic Author completely failed to explore the true inner workings of the SES. That is Senior Executive Service. 3000+ employees (as far as we know) who have systematically taken control of all gov. Corporations as well as many ‘private’ corporations. These executives claim they cannot even be terminated by the POTUS. Deep state. Author’s funding and employer should be disclosed. After all they went on and on and on about transparency.

Expand full comment

This article may be summed up in the following way: "Move along, nothing to see here." Its argument is circular and it is self-referential. This appears to be a gatekeeping exercise.

Expand full comment