It's iimportant that this information is being made more public. There is now an expectation that a " new " Director will start specific corrective procedures needed. Of point, one must question the validity of " Inspectors Generals" past oversight for these gov depts. What have they been doing all these years?
Thanks for this detailed overview. I will reference it heavily in my communications with my Reps. My personal action is to have Sheriff's / Assoc. take a public stance in their jurisdictions when dealing with any Fed law enforcement.
Mr H - noticed your practice of engaging local LEO in dealing w Fed LE -- seems this has happened in your area, how has that gone? Assume you built a relationship/rapport w the local folks first -- are they willing to engage and helpful, do they understand the reason you go to them first?
Retired LEO with background in LE Assoc. organizing and administering, including political lobbying activity, but that is 30 years past, little direct relationship with current LE administrations statewide, thats why I post material to assn groups. as a retiree, I claim my background to get my foot in the door. I believe that getting the information ( especially as is presented on many of these substack sites ) directly to Sheriffs, Chiefs individually and thru their respective assoc.'s - and base LE officer assoc.s is beneficial, so I forward it , especially as it applys to dealing with the current FBI. It would certainly be more effective if public " groups " pushed the info to those representatives. Locally, I personally know the LE Admins, it is a rural area of strong conservative value, tho the state fails that assessment. Bottom line, the more that LE admin hears from citizens, the better the desired results. Organized efforts are better, but individual effort still helps. As a side, way back when, my training officer told me that the FBI guys were great to go have a beer with, good BS stories ( tho they would conveniently have to answer a " phone call " when it was their turn to buy the round ). But he warned me to never take on or work any case with the FBI - for obvious reasons - you were the fall guy if things went south. Great advice then, still is.
I encourage all who have these concerns also forward info/requests for action directly to their LE reps.
I sincerely appreciate your engagement. No one can escape the weight of their own policies, our laws, or the operational frameworks they themselves have established. The systems they rely on to exert control also serve as the mechanisms by which they can be held accountable.
This is the second installment in a series I’ve written, and I firmly believe the issues at hand are of grave importance. Your willingness to take this further—to wherever you see fit—is invaluable. Accountability is not optional; it is the only path to rectifying the wrongful actions of our federal law enforcement agencies. Without it, the erosion of trust and integrity will only continue.
230420 Terrance Yeakey police officer 1st on the scene at Oklahoma City bombing . . . Believed killed by the FBI . . . Kept trying to tell anyone who would listen that there was more to the story.
Quote: . . . provided a charter for the federal judicial system by specifying the jurisdiction and powers of the district and circuit courts, and the qualifications and authority of federal judges, district attorneys, court clerks, U.S. Marshals, and Deputy Marshals.
…
The history of the U.S. Marshals is the story of a nation's unending attempt to balance the need for law and order against the demand for individual freedom and the rights of the states.
The U.S. The Marshals Service, unlike the FBI, is directly codified into the U.S. Constitution . . . Summarily dispatch this thoroughly compromised FBI in no uncertain terms while each of the Agents found to have violated any aspect of their Oaths of Office by participating in such things as the Mar-A-Lago assault , , , and this includes the likes of Merrick Garland and Christopher Wray , , , are all indicted and ultimately tried for TREASON against America . . .
Quote: . . . If we encroach on the free-speech rights of groups that we dislike today, those same doctrines can be used to suppress freedom of speech for future groups that we don’t like.
This is a statement that points to the FBI leadership being infiltrated by those who plot the destruction of the country and ensuring the FBI is key to that plan. The enemy within is the most dangerous, especially one that is part of a constitutional republic’s rule of law.
I hate to tell you this , but your opening line about the FIB is complete BS. It was not established to Protect and Serve the the American people. The FIB was established during the First World War as an surveillance of the Anti -war movement. Next, that Cross-Dressing Racist Faggot, ( direct quote to me from a Black FBI agent while I was remodeling their office's) Hoover started blackmailing every politician in DC. for more power and money. Now it is nothing more than the enforcement arm of the Democrat party, like the KKK
You missed the point. That was not my opinion, that is what the FBI claims. There’s details that you’re leaving out that apply to their ethos and behavior today. Hoover did not start the FBI, he rebranded it. It was first called the BI.
The Bureau of Investigation (BI), before it became the FBI, was involved in several controversies during its early years (1908–1935). Many of these controversies stemmed from political influence, lack of oversight, and questionable investigative tactics. Sound familiar?
Below are some of the major controversies:
1. The BI’s Creation Itself (1908) – A Political Power Struggle
• Controversy: The BI was created without congressional approval, which led to outrage in Congress.
Background:
• Attorney General Charles Bonaparte created the BI under President Theodore Roosevelt, largely because Congress had forbidden the DOJ from using Secret Service agents for investigations.
• Congress viewed this move as an executive overreach, fearing that a federal police force could be weaponized for political purposes.
• The result was strong opposition, leading to early restrictions on the BI’s scope and activities.
2. World War I & The “Radical Roundups” (1917–1920)
• Controversy: The BI was accused of suppressing free speech and violating civil liberties.
Background:
• During World War I, the BI, under the Espionage Act of 1917, aggressively pursued anti-war activists, socialists, and suspected radicals.
• This escalated into the Palmer Raids (1919–1920), named after Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer.
• Thousands of suspected anarchists, communists, and immigrants were arrested and deported without due process.
• Many of the arrests were based on weak or fabricated evidence, sparking civil rights concerns.
3. The BI’s Role in The Teapot Dome Scandal (1920s)
• Controversy: BI agents were involved in covering up one of the biggest corruption scandals in U.S. history.
Background:
• The Teapot Dome scandal involved illegal oil leases and bribery at the highest levels of government, particularly within the Harding administration.
• The BI was used to intimidate and investigate political enemies rather than expose the corruption.
• This scandal damaged the credibility of federal law enforcement, raising concerns that the BI could be politically weaponized.
4. The Gangster Era & Hoover’s Rise to Power (1920s–1930s)
• Controversy: J. Edgar Hoover’s obsessive control and targeting of political enemies began in this period.
Background:
• Hoover joined the BI in 1921 and was appointed Director in 1924.
• Under Hoover, the BI began expanding its surveillance programs, including monitoring politicians, activists, and journalists.
• His obsession with “public enemies” like John Dillinger and Al Capone helped the BI gain public support, but he also used the agency to gather personal files on political figures.
• By 1935, when the BI was rebranded as the FBI, Hoover had already consolidated unprecedented power, setting the stage for decades of political surveillance and civil rights violations.
The BI’s Legacy of Controversy
The Bureau of Investigation was created as a law enforcement agency that was claimed to be free from political influence, yet it was immediately used for political purposes.
From its questionable origins to its involvement in civil rights abuses, corruption cover-ups, and political surveillance, the BI’s legacy was riddled with controversy.
By the time it became the FBI in 1935, Hoover had already turned it into a tool for political control—a pattern that would only grow in the decades to come to what we see today.
While I agree the FBI is corrupt, couldn’t get past ‘the missed opportunity reporting of middle eastern men taking flying lessons prior to 9/11. Total BS…our own gov’t plus others was responsible not terrorists. I would think by now, everyone knows that. Next up…Kavanaugh….are you trying to say he was guilty but FBI failed to investigate properly??
Seems like you missed it. Thats litterally what Im saying. They were responsible. "Our Government." But hey, you do you.
The Phoenix Memo: A Missed Warning Before 9/11
On July 10, 2001, FBI Special Agent Kenneth Williams sent a memo warning that Middle Eastern men were attending U.S. flight schools and that this might indicate preparations for terrorist activities. The memo was direct, actionable, and chillingly accurate.
But what happened?
Nothing.<<<< They, Our governemnt, did nopthing...
The memo was buried in bureaucracy, ignored by decision-makers who had the power to act. Two months later, on September 11, 2001, nearly 3,000 Americans lost their lives in the worst terrorist attack in U.S. history.
This wasn’t a case of hindsight being 20/20. The warning was explicit, and the information was credible. But the FBI’s failure to act exposed a rot within the institution—a culture of inefficiency, a lack of coordination, and an unwillingness to challenge the status quo.
FYI, If the FBI would have investigated
They failed to interview key witnesses who could have provided relevant testimony. OF HIS INNOCENCE. I'm sorry, you don't find it relevant, but I surely do. They narrowed the scope of the investigation when they were trying to hang him for all the accusations they were making, and yet they didn't investigate 4,500 different discrepancies? That can only indicate one thing, they obviously knew that possibilituy? Good luck with that one.
Where you been? And then 6 at one time, have my work cut out -- thanks in advance.
Been working on a project. Took longer than anticipated..
It's iimportant that this information is being made more public. There is now an expectation that a " new " Director will start specific corrective procedures needed. Of point, one must question the validity of " Inspectors Generals" past oversight for these gov depts. What have they been doing all these years?
Thanks for this detailed overview. I will reference it heavily in my communications with my Reps. My personal action is to have Sheriff's / Assoc. take a public stance in their jurisdictions when dealing with any Fed law enforcement.
Mr H - noticed your practice of engaging local LEO in dealing w Fed LE -- seems this has happened in your area, how has that gone? Assume you built a relationship/rapport w the local folks first -- are they willing to engage and helpful, do they understand the reason you go to them first?
Retired LEO with background in LE Assoc. organizing and administering, including political lobbying activity, but that is 30 years past, little direct relationship with current LE administrations statewide, thats why I post material to assn groups. as a retiree, I claim my background to get my foot in the door. I believe that getting the information ( especially as is presented on many of these substack sites ) directly to Sheriffs, Chiefs individually and thru their respective assoc.'s - and base LE officer assoc.s is beneficial, so I forward it , especially as it applys to dealing with the current FBI. It would certainly be more effective if public " groups " pushed the info to those representatives. Locally, I personally know the LE Admins, it is a rural area of strong conservative value, tho the state fails that assessment. Bottom line, the more that LE admin hears from citizens, the better the desired results. Organized efforts are better, but individual effort still helps. As a side, way back when, my training officer told me that the FBI guys were great to go have a beer with, good BS stories ( tho they would conveniently have to answer a " phone call " when it was their turn to buy the round ). But he warned me to never take on or work any case with the FBI - for obvious reasons - you were the fall guy if things went south. Great advice then, still is.
I encourage all who have these concerns also forward info/requests for action directly to their LE reps.
I sincerely appreciate your engagement. No one can escape the weight of their own policies, our laws, or the operational frameworks they themselves have established. The systems they rely on to exert control also serve as the mechanisms by which they can be held accountable.
This is the second installment in a series I’ve written, and I firmly believe the issues at hand are of grave importance. Your willingness to take this further—to wherever you see fit—is invaluable. Accountability is not optional; it is the only path to rectifying the wrongful actions of our federal law enforcement agencies. Without it, the erosion of trust and integrity will only continue.
230513 Four Unconstitutional Organizations ==> Fed, ADL, FBI, IRS
All Founded in 1913
230420 Terrance Yeakey police officer 1st on the scene at Oklahoma City bombing . . . Believed killed by the FBI . . . Kept trying to tell anyone who would listen that there was more to the story.
Judiciary Act of 1789: Charter for U.S. Marshals and Deputies
https://www.usmarshals.gov/who-we-are/about-us/history/historical-reading-room/judiciary-act-of-1789-charter-us-marshals-and-deputies
Quote: . . . provided a charter for the federal judicial system by specifying the jurisdiction and powers of the district and circuit courts, and the qualifications and authority of federal judges, district attorneys, court clerks, U.S. Marshals, and Deputy Marshals.
…
The history of the U.S. Marshals is the story of a nation's unending attempt to balance the need for law and order against the demand for individual freedom and the rights of the states.
The U.S. The Marshals Service, unlike the FBI, is directly codified into the U.S. Constitution . . . Summarily dispatch this thoroughly compromised FBI in no uncertain terms while each of the Agents found to have violated any aspect of their Oaths of Office by participating in such things as the Mar-A-Lago assault , , , and this includes the likes of Merrick Garland and Christopher Wray , , , are all indicted and ultimately tried for TREASON against America . . .
* Heckler’s Veto
https://www.aclumich.org/en/cases/hecklers-veto
Quote: . . . If we encroach on the free-speech rights of groups that we dislike today, those same doctrines can be used to suppress freedom of speech for future groups that we don’t like.
If we don’t stop corruption in an agency that is not mandated by our founding documents….we are complicit.
This is a statement that points to the FBI leadership being infiltrated by those who plot the destruction of the country and ensuring the FBI is key to that plan. The enemy within is the most dangerous, especially one that is part of a constitutional republic’s rule of law.
I hate to tell you this , but your opening line about the FIB is complete BS. It was not established to Protect and Serve the the American people. The FIB was established during the First World War as an surveillance of the Anti -war movement. Next, that Cross-Dressing Racist Faggot, ( direct quote to me from a Black FBI agent while I was remodeling their office's) Hoover started blackmailing every politician in DC. for more power and money. Now it is nothing more than the enforcement arm of the Democrat party, like the KKK
You missed the point. That was not my opinion, that is what the FBI claims. There’s details that you’re leaving out that apply to their ethos and behavior today. Hoover did not start the FBI, he rebranded it. It was first called the BI.
The Bureau of Investigation (BI), before it became the FBI, was involved in several controversies during its early years (1908–1935). Many of these controversies stemmed from political influence, lack of oversight, and questionable investigative tactics. Sound familiar?
Below are some of the major controversies:
1. The BI’s Creation Itself (1908) – A Political Power Struggle
• Controversy: The BI was created without congressional approval, which led to outrage in Congress.
Background:
• Attorney General Charles Bonaparte created the BI under President Theodore Roosevelt, largely because Congress had forbidden the DOJ from using Secret Service agents for investigations.
• Congress viewed this move as an executive overreach, fearing that a federal police force could be weaponized for political purposes.
• The result was strong opposition, leading to early restrictions on the BI’s scope and activities.
2. World War I & The “Radical Roundups” (1917–1920)
• Controversy: The BI was accused of suppressing free speech and violating civil liberties.
Background:
• During World War I, the BI, under the Espionage Act of 1917, aggressively pursued anti-war activists, socialists, and suspected radicals.
• This escalated into the Palmer Raids (1919–1920), named after Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer.
• Thousands of suspected anarchists, communists, and immigrants were arrested and deported without due process.
• Many of the arrests were based on weak or fabricated evidence, sparking civil rights concerns.
3. The BI’s Role in The Teapot Dome Scandal (1920s)
• Controversy: BI agents were involved in covering up one of the biggest corruption scandals in U.S. history.
Background:
• The Teapot Dome scandal involved illegal oil leases and bribery at the highest levels of government, particularly within the Harding administration.
• The BI was used to intimidate and investigate political enemies rather than expose the corruption.
• This scandal damaged the credibility of federal law enforcement, raising concerns that the BI could be politically weaponized.
4. The Gangster Era & Hoover’s Rise to Power (1920s–1930s)
• Controversy: J. Edgar Hoover’s obsessive control and targeting of political enemies began in this period.
Background:
• Hoover joined the BI in 1921 and was appointed Director in 1924.
• Under Hoover, the BI began expanding its surveillance programs, including monitoring politicians, activists, and journalists.
• His obsession with “public enemies” like John Dillinger and Al Capone helped the BI gain public support, but he also used the agency to gather personal files on political figures.
• By 1935, when the BI was rebranded as the FBI, Hoover had already consolidated unprecedented power, setting the stage for decades of political surveillance and civil rights violations.
The BI’s Legacy of Controversy
The Bureau of Investigation was created as a law enforcement agency that was claimed to be free from political influence, yet it was immediately used for political purposes.
From its questionable origins to its involvement in civil rights abuses, corruption cover-ups, and political surveillance, the BI’s legacy was riddled with controversy.
By the time it became the FBI in 1935, Hoover had already turned it into a tool for political control—a pattern that would only grow in the decades to come to what we see today.
Love your show or articles
It stinks.
While I agree the FBI is corrupt, couldn’t get past ‘the missed opportunity reporting of middle eastern men taking flying lessons prior to 9/11. Total BS…our own gov’t plus others was responsible not terrorists. I would think by now, everyone knows that. Next up…Kavanaugh….are you trying to say he was guilty but FBI failed to investigate properly??
Strike 2. Didn’t bother reading any more…sorry.
Seems like you missed it. Thats litterally what Im saying. They were responsible. "Our Government." But hey, you do you.
The Phoenix Memo: A Missed Warning Before 9/11
On July 10, 2001, FBI Special Agent Kenneth Williams sent a memo warning that Middle Eastern men were attending U.S. flight schools and that this might indicate preparations for terrorist activities. The memo was direct, actionable, and chillingly accurate.
But what happened?
Nothing.<<<< They, Our governemnt, did nopthing...
The memo was buried in bureaucracy, ignored by decision-makers who had the power to act. Two months later, on September 11, 2001, nearly 3,000 Americans lost their lives in the worst terrorist attack in U.S. history.
This wasn’t a case of hindsight being 20/20. The warning was explicit, and the information was credible. But the FBI’s failure to act exposed a rot within the institution—a culture of inefficiency, a lack of coordination, and an unwillingness to challenge the status quo.
FYI, If the FBI would have investigated
They failed to interview key witnesses who could have provided relevant testimony. OF HIS INNOCENCE. I'm sorry, you don't find it relevant, but I surely do. They narrowed the scope of the investigation when they were trying to hang him for all the accusations they were making, and yet they didn't investigate 4,500 different discrepancies? That can only indicate one thing, they obviously knew that possibilituy? Good luck with that one.
They knew.