20 Comments

Someone's done a lot of work! Thanks.

Expand full comment

Wonderfully written and excellently described work of the classified system for the military as well as the times military may be used within the country.

A key point is at the beginning, “Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution, which guarantees the states a republican form of government and protection against invasion and domestic violence.” We currently have an invasion of foreign entities at the border, as well as domestic violence arising from the this invasion. Why are we utilizing our military to defend other countries’ borders instead of our own?

Another issue involves the agencies tasked to fulfill the missions, “Strategic Implementation: The directive calls for the Secretary of State, Attorney General, Secretary of Homeland Security, and Director of National Intelligence to synchronize efforts in this endeavor.” At this point, each of these agencies is demonstrably corrupt.

I had a TS/SCI in my career, and upon retirement, that classification was closed, because at that point, I neither had access, nor a need to know. Again, corruption permeates this. The fact that Clapper, Brennan, Obama and HRC, for example, retained their classification access long after their public ‘service’ and again, this is easily corrupted. Which constitutes treason.

“18 U.S.C. §§ 175a, 229E, and 2332e cross reference to the Attorney General’s authority under 10 U.S.C. § 282 to request assistance from the Secretary in an emergency involving biological weapons, chemical weapons, and weapons of mass destruction respectively.” Each state has civil support teams and the states also have support agreements with each other to support things like federal conventions, Super Bowl events, etc. they likely are part of the process that arguably are NOT corrupt. They could be critical during the next year given the invasion on the border.

Yes, there definitely ARE situations where the President, or Congress might not be ‘read in’ to a SAP. Currently, the DoD leadership is more concerned with woke ideology vs their role/tasks via a SAP.

“The United States Code, specifically 10 USC 284, presents a nuanced mechanism that allows for military involvement in civilian law enforcement, particularly under specific circumstances. This provision grants the Secretary of Defense the authority to support counter-drug activities or actions against transnational organized crime. It extends this support not only to federal agencies but also to state, local, tribal, and foreign law enforcement entities. The breadth of this law is significant; it accommodates a wide array of situations, providing a legal framework for military assistance in various law enforcement contexts.” Why isn’t this being executed given the drug cartels trafficking humans and drugs INTO the country? I’d guess the answer is a corrupt Secretary of Defense.

Your last topic just might have the answers many are speculating about. “Operation Integrity Sentinel: The Take Down of a Corrupt Government is a speculated scenario exploring the possibilities of the use of Military Operations.” This would necessarily require the highest classification. Hmmm....

Thank you for the wealth of knowledge and may God bless you and your efforts!🙏🙏

Expand full comment

What I thought interesting was the Posse Comitatus document link that I have in the article, you should check it out, it's quite interesting.

Expand full comment

I’m very familiar with it from my work experience. It will be interesting to see what happens in the next year. Confident that it is in God’s hands.🙏🙏

Expand full comment

I retired in 2010. It was from 2018. A lot changed since 2010. Was interesting to see.

Expand full comment

Yes. I retired in 2012 and, you’re correct…a lot has changed and I’d expect much more soon. You have done such a great job educating people that normally would not have the opportunity to learn about this. God bless you.🙏🙏

Expand full comment

God bless you brother..

Expand full comment

Great framework, and so many possibilities.

Expand full comment

Thank you --I will be reading this in full. Appreciate you providing it here. Merry Christmas to you and happy new year.

Expand full comment

Yes, the military does include the United States Marine Corps. It is part of the U.S. Armed Forces, and under the Department of the Navy. which is under the Secretary of Defense within the Executive Branch. The U.S. Navy does not go by admiralty. It goes by the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So does the Army, so does the Marines, Space Force, Air Force, etc. The United States of Washington, District of Columbia?, there's no such thing as that. It's the United States of America and District of Columbia is our nation's capital. It's a federal district with a local charter government. Look it up.

Expand full comment

With all the evidence indicating the clot shots have done no good and caused only varrying degrees of harm, why not classify them as WMD's and begin prosecutions of those responsible?

Expand full comment

Karen Kingston, among other fearless truthtellers, has been using the term "bioweapon" for months. I've decided to bump it up to WMD, as this harkens back to images of the Bush regime, Iraq, Scott Ritter and Colin Powell at the U.N. I think it's time to up the ante with this type of subliminal impact.

Expand full comment

Are there classifications above TS/SCI that apply to unacknowledged SAPs? I'm just a layman, but the "need to know" requirement may have spawned secrecy on another level. If so, no one in the federal government, or even in the Pentagon or the IC, would know that these pass-through SAPs exist, only those who have been privately read in. This would mean there is a hidden government beyond the knowledge of Trump or the military. Is there any truth to this from your point of knowledge, or is it just fantasy?

Expand full comment

TS/SCI is the highest security clearance in the Department of Defense. Department of Energy has other classifications such as Q clearance. The unacknowledged waived special access program does pose a risk. Although the president is supposed to have access to all and any program and I'm sure if the president asked or inquired he could be able to find out. My point is that it is possible that a special access program could be isolated from the president through its very nature of how it's set up. Is it supposed to be isolated from the president? No. But it could be. And due to its classified and secret nature, no one really knows if it's been done before in the past. Isolating from the president, I mean specifically. But this is highly more likely for military operations to be conducted than continuity of government or some kind of military occupancy. Those two theories are, there's no framework for it. It's fantasy. The SAP program and bypassing posse comitatus, that is a possibility and it's in law and the Constitution.

Expand full comment

Siloes of responsibility allowed them to get this far. I believe that is the same mechanism that allows the good guys the room to identify the trouble, and eventually deal with it.

Expand full comment

I've known several times where state agencies, such as state police or prison or county jails have trained the military on how to handle things like civilian patrols, jail intake procedures, and building searches, because the military doesn't normally do things like that.

In my opinion, the federal government is so encumbered by security classifications that it sometimes hobbles itself.

Expand full comment

Looks like the special access gonna bye-bye. And hey this article say it began 20 years ago. You jokers hanged me because I said in the 70s when I was in with TS and need to know we didn't call it special access.... you said it's been called that since George Washington. Yall don't know. https://americanmilitarynews.com/2024/01/pentagon-making-huge-changes-to-secret-space-programs-tech/

Expand full comment

Who said it was called Special Access Programs since GW??

Expand full comment

March 25, 2003

EXECUTIVE ORDER 13292

Sec. 4.3. Special Access Programs. (a) Establishment of special access programs. Unless otherwise authorized by the President, only the Secretaries of State, Defense, and Energy, and the Director of Central Intelligence, or the principal deputy of each, may create a special access program.

Expand full comment