For those that haven't seen it, Nick also left a great comment on PP's "Introduction to Devolution" article that is well worth a read. It's a pity that we can't join in the conversation in that thread since it's only for paying subscribers :(
https://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/an-introduction-to-devolution/comments
For those that haven't seen it, Nick also left a great comment on PP's "Introduction to Devolution" article that is well worth a read. It's a pity that we can't join in the conversation in that thread since it's only for paying subscribers :(
Thank you so kindly. That comment you link is when I began to see the deep flaws in this "devolution" theory. And the more obvious the flaws became, the more the devotees of the theory became indignant against criticism. The author of the series never actually clarifies what devolution "is". He just maintains it's so. He never actually makes it clear that "Trump is still president" (never saying it directly); he just asserts that "Trump will return (as president) before the midterms". But never says how that "return" will occur, or what mechanism will initiate it. He tends to interpret Executive Orders as though they are binding on the whole of the government, when in fact they are little more than Executive Branch inner-office memorandum. They are worthless to Congress or the Judiciary, let alone each individual state. He tends to bleat on about passages buried inside policy manuals as though these are statutes. Basically, his whole approach becomes less and less substantive the more you apply the most basic scrutiny.
I want to make myself clear because you make an equivocation here. This patel patriot's "devolution" and Q's operation are in no way linked. In fact this author admits he knows nothing about Q or has read any of the drops. And it shows. His "devolution" theory circumvents describing what it actually is, vs. countless posts and articles he writes simply saying each piece is a "proof", or a "receipt", that devolution is in effect. Ask him if Trump is still president. He won't say yes or no. He just says that his belief is Trump will "return before the midterms". But also doesn't say how such a "return" will happen. The "devolution" series is essentially a book report by a high school student who got high marks from a complacent teacher & student body, but cannot withstand the simplest scrutiny.
I reject your premise entirely about Q. The idea a "psyop" lasts for 4 years as opposition is utterly ludicrous, and it's a hymn sung by those who will believe something only if it exists in concretized form right in front of them. Posobeic called out nothing. He simply expressed an opinion - but that was in the early days. I've actually heard him in the last year use language in the drops. Posobeic is a reporter posing as an "intelligence officer". He links the label of "intelligence officer" to his resume to get media jobs. That's it. He's proven what he knows is actually little. And gets plenty wrong. Using him as a source of Q debunking is simply absurd.
Q is a military operation (OPLAN). The drops are about suggestion because there are federal laws in place about classified disclosure. You can't disclose factual data that's classified. But you can pose questions about the classified information in the interrogative format. That's why many of the drops are questions. There have been far too many zero deltas as proofs Trump knows full well about Q and the mission of the operation. Trump's even been asked by anons to signal codes, and on occasions he has. The idea Q is a psyop is usually believed by those who think nothing exists until it rests in obviousness right in front of them. So on this matter we are not kindred spirits at all. Yes, "devolution" is utter nonsense. Q is authentic. If you choose not to believe that, so be it.
Agreed! I would love to read more from Nick.
For those that haven't seen it, Nick also left a great comment on PP's "Introduction to Devolution" article that is well worth a read. It's a pity that we can't join in the conversation in that thread since it's only for paying subscribers :(
https://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/an-introduction-to-devolution/comments
Thank you so kindly. That comment you link is when I began to see the deep flaws in this "devolution" theory. And the more obvious the flaws became, the more the devotees of the theory became indignant against criticism. The author of the series never actually clarifies what devolution "is". He just maintains it's so. He never actually makes it clear that "Trump is still president" (never saying it directly); he just asserts that "Trump will return (as president) before the midterms". But never says how that "return" will occur, or what mechanism will initiate it. He tends to interpret Executive Orders as though they are binding on the whole of the government, when in fact they are little more than Executive Branch inner-office memorandum. They are worthless to Congress or the Judiciary, let alone each individual state. He tends to bleat on about passages buried inside policy manuals as though these are statutes. Basically, his whole approach becomes less and less substantive the more you apply the most basic scrutiny.
I want to make myself clear because you make an equivocation here. This patel patriot's "devolution" and Q's operation are in no way linked. In fact this author admits he knows nothing about Q or has read any of the drops. And it shows. His "devolution" theory circumvents describing what it actually is, vs. countless posts and articles he writes simply saying each piece is a "proof", or a "receipt", that devolution is in effect. Ask him if Trump is still president. He won't say yes or no. He just says that his belief is Trump will "return before the midterms". But also doesn't say how such a "return" will happen. The "devolution" series is essentially a book report by a high school student who got high marks from a complacent teacher & student body, but cannot withstand the simplest scrutiny.
I reject your premise entirely about Q. The idea a "psyop" lasts for 4 years as opposition is utterly ludicrous, and it's a hymn sung by those who will believe something only if it exists in concretized form right in front of them. Posobeic called out nothing. He simply expressed an opinion - but that was in the early days. I've actually heard him in the last year use language in the drops. Posobeic is a reporter posing as an "intelligence officer". He links the label of "intelligence officer" to his resume to get media jobs. That's it. He's proven what he knows is actually little. And gets plenty wrong. Using him as a source of Q debunking is simply absurd.
Q is a military operation (OPLAN). The drops are about suggestion because there are federal laws in place about classified disclosure. You can't disclose factual data that's classified. But you can pose questions about the classified information in the interrogative format. That's why many of the drops are questions. There have been far too many zero deltas as proofs Trump knows full well about Q and the mission of the operation. Trump's even been asked by anons to signal codes, and on occasions he has. The idea Q is a psyop is usually believed by those who think nothing exists until it rests in obviousness right in front of them. So on this matter we are not kindred spirits at all. Yes, "devolution" is utter nonsense. Q is authentic. If you choose not to believe that, so be it.