THE HIDDEN INFLUENCE
THE POWER OF NGO'S INFLUENCE ON POLITICS AND POLICIES
Introduction
What does the term coalition mean? A lot of the coordinated efforts to undermine the American people are structured and legal. Let me repeat that: many of the actions undermining the American people are both structured and legal. This is not widely known to the public for obvious reasons, but I'm going to show you.
When we think of non-profit organizations, we often think of 501(c) (3)’s. But what does that really mean?
The non-profit organizational structure is more nuanced, and it's something that Americans really need to understand to grasp what's happening around them. As you read further, consider every aspect of our involvement in civic activities: voting, elections, taxes, tax reform, our Second Amendment rights, our First Amendment rights—everything that constitutes an initiative. Keep these in mind as you continue reading.
This will be one of the most important things you'll ever read, and one of the most critical things you'll learn as an American. By understanding these aspects, we can use this knowledge to our advantage and learn how to stop unwanted changes in our communities. This is how policy changes happen—right here.
Ever wonder how influential figures like George Soros infiltrated our local governments, influenced candidate selection, and shaped policy legislation? Understanding the intricate web of legal and structured actions behind these efforts is crucial for every American. By grasping this reality, we empower ourselves to better navigate and influence the socio-political landscape around us.
So, what is a coalition? In, the context of U.S. politics and governance across federal, state, and local levels, a coalition refers to an alliance of distinct groups or organizations that come together to achieve common political goals or to influence policy decisions. These groups, which can include political parties, interest groups, non-profits, businesses, and grassroots organizations, collaborate to pool resources, share information, and coordinate actions to exert greater influence than they could individually.
Political Coalitions, The Secret Power in America
Coalitions can be a powerful tool for "we the people." However, their effectiveness depends on how they are used. While coalitions can unite diverse groups for common causes, they can also be exploited by entities looking to take advantage of the system and exploit legal loopholes.
In U.S. politics, coalitions are essential for addressing specific issues, supporting broader political objectives, and exerting influence at various levels of government. Coalitions form to tackle particular issues or support broader political aims, such as passing legislation, advocating for policy changes, or electing preferred candidates. They often include members from different backgrounds and interests, united by a common cause. This diversity can provide a broad base of support and offer various perspectives on the issue at hand.
Effective coalitions coordinate activities such as lobbying, public campaigns, and voter mobilization to maximize their impact. This involves strategic planning and task allocation among members. Coalitions operate at all levels of government: at the federal level, they might influence Congress, the executive branch, or federal agencies; at the state level, they may focus on state legislatures, governors, or state agencies; and locally, they can target city councils, mayors, county boards, and other municipal bodies. They function within a legal and structural framework, adhering to laws and regulations governing political activities, lobbying, and non-profit operations.
Examples of coalitions in U.S. politics include issue-based coalitions, such as groups advocating for environmental protection, healthcare reform, or gun rights, which often form to amplify their voices and increase their lobbying power. Electoral coalitions involve political parties and candidates forming alliances with various interest groups to broaden their appeal to voters and enhance their electoral prospects. Community coalitions, at the local level, might address community-specific issues, such as zoning laws, public safety, or education reforms.
Coalitions play a crucial role in shaping policy and governance in the United States by leveraging the combined strength of their members to achieve shared objectives.
We understand what a coalition is, but how does it work? How are they structured? The process I just explained is highly organized and detailed. Interestingly, this coalition process has often been used against us. It seems that this information has been deliberately hidden or erased from our knowledge base, which might explain why civics and political science are no longer widely taught in schools. This lack of awareness among the American people appears to be intentional. Welcome to the secret code of how things are done in American politics. Prepare to be empowered.
We often hear about how George Soros has infiltrated U.S. politics at the local level. But have you ever wondered how that's even possible? How can a man from across the world influence American politics so profoundly? What I'm about to show you is something we need to grasp and learn how to use it. If we cannot grasp these concepts, there will be no way to defend against them. This raises an important question: where are the Republican coalitions? Why do these efforts seem to be predominantly focused on the Democrat Party? The Democrats, ladies and gentlemen, are extremely organized. If we don't get our act together, they will continue to outmaneuver us.
The Weaponization of Non-Government Organizations
In the United States, we have various types of nonprofit entities. It's important to understand these classifications and how they define the purposes and activities of each organization. Equally important is understanding how these different types of nonprofits can collaborate to enhance their impact and achieve common goals.
Understanding the different types of nonprofit entities can be crucial for anyone involved in charitable, social, or political activities. Here's a detailed look at the various categories, their purposes, and their operational requirements.
501(c)(3) Organizations: These are charitable organizations recognized by the IRS for purposes such as religious, educational, scientific, literary, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. Donations to 501(c)(3) organizations are tax-deductible for the donor. Examples include universities, hospitals, public charities, and private foundations. While they generally don't have to publicly disclose donors, they must provide the IRS with a list of significant donors on Schedule B of Form 990, which is not made public. They are required to have a board of directors or trustees and must file Form 990 annually, which is public and includes financial information, governance practices, and executive compensation. Additionally, they must adopt bylaws outlining their structure and governance policies.
501(c)(4) Organizations: These social welfare organizations focus on promoting the common good and general welfare of the community and can engage in lobbying and political activities. Examples include civic leagues and advocacy organizations. They don't have to publicly disclose donors but must report substantial donors to the IRS on Schedule B of Form 990, which is not public. A board of directors or trustees is required, and they must file Form 990, detailing financial information, governance, and activities. They also must adopt bylaws governing their operations.
501(c)(5) Organizations: These entities focus on improving conditions for workers and producers, including labor, agricultural, or horticultural organizations. Examples are labor unions and agricultural cooperatives. Donor disclosure is not required, but they must report donor information to the IRS on Schedule B of Form 990, which is not public. They must have a governing board and file Form 990, making financial and governance details public. They also need to establish bylaws for governance.
501(c)(6) Organizations: This category includes business leagues, chambers of commerce, real estate boards, boards of trade, and professional football leagues (if no part of their net earnings benefits any private shareholder or individual). Examples are chambers of commerce and trade associations. Donor disclosure is not required, but donor information must be reported to the IRS on Schedule B of Form 990, which is not public. They must have a governing board and file Form 990, making financial and governance information public, and they must have bylaws that govern their operations.
501(c)(7) Organizations: These are social and recreational clubs organized for pleasure, recreation, and other non-profitable purposes. Examples include country clubs, hobby clubs, and sports clubs. They don't need to publicly disclose donors but must report donor information to the IRS on Schedule B of Form 990, which is not public. They need a governing board and must file Form 990, which includes financial information and governance practices, and they must establish bylaws for governance.
501(c)(8) and 501(c)(10) Organizations: Fraternal beneficiary societies (501(c)(8)) and domestic fraternal societies (501(c)(10)) provide for the payment of life, sick, accident, or other benefits to members. Examples include fraternal orders like the Elks or Masons. They don't have to publicly disclose donors but must report donor information to the IRS on Schedule B of Form 990, which is not public. They are required to have a governing body and must file Form 990, making financial and governance information public, and adopt bylaws for governance.
501(c)(19) Organizations: These veterans' organizations benefit past or present members of the U.S. Armed Forces. Examples include Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) and the American Legion. They don't need to publicly disclose donors but must report donor information to the IRS on Schedule B of Form 990, which is not public. They must have a governing board and are required to file Form 990, detailing financial and governance information, and establish bylaws that govern their operations.
527 Organizations: These political organizations aim to influence the selection, nomination, election, appointment, or defeat of candidates to federal, state, or local public office. Examples include political action committees (PACs) and political parties. They must publicly disclose donors and file regular reports with the IRS, including Form 8872 (Political Organization Report of Contributions and Expenditures), which is publicly accessible. They need a governing body, though the structure may vary, and must file periodic reports (e.g., Form 8871 and Form 8872) with the IRS, making financial information and donor contributions public. They also need bylaws outlining governance and operational procedures.
Collaboration Opportunities Among Nonprofits: Maximizing Impact
Nonprofit entities in the United States come with distinct IRS classifications, each serving specific purposes with unique donor disclosure requirements and corporate structure transparency rules. By collaborating, these entities can amplify their impact, provided they adhere to federal and state regulations to maintain their tax-exempt status and public trust. Here’s how they can effectively work together:
Joint Programs and Advocacy: Imagine a 501(c)(3) charity, such as a public health organization, providing research and educational content. A 501(c)(4) advocacy group can then use this information to lobby for policy changes. However, it’s crucial to ensure that funds from the 501(c)(3) are not used for lobbying activities, which could jeopardize its tax-exempt status.
Public-Private Partnerships: A 501(c)(6) business league might partner with a 501(c)(3) educational institution to develop workforce training programs. These collaborations can be incredibly beneficial but must maintain transparency and accountability in resource allocation to avoid conflicts of interest.
Community Service and Development: Consider a 501(c)(7) social club teaming up with a 501(c)(3) community organization to support local service projects. Such partnerships should ensure that activities remain aligned with the charitable mission and do not inappropriately benefit private interests.
Research and Public Education: A 501(c)(3) research institution could join forces with a 501(c)(5) labor organization to study workforce issues. The resulting research can inform advocacy efforts by a 501(c)(4). However, it’s vital to clearly delineate activities to ensure compliance with IRS regulations for each organization type.
The intricate network of nonprofit entities, while designed to foster community development and public welfare, can also be weaponized to work against the American people or target political opponents. When coordinated effectively, these organizations can exert significant influence over public opinion, policymaking, and even election outcomes. For instance, a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization might engage in aggressive lobbying and advocacy efforts, shaping legislation and public policies to favor specific agendas. These efforts can be supported by 501(c)(3) charities that provide ostensibly neutral research and educational content, which may be biased to support the advocacy group's objectives.
Moreover, 527 political organizations, such as PACs, can flood the political landscape with targeted campaigns aimed at discrediting a politician running for president. By leveraging substantial financial resources and strategically disseminating information through various media channels, these entities can sway public perception and undermine a candidate's credibility. Simultaneously, 501(c)(6) business leagues and 501(c)(5) labor unions can mobilize their extensive networks to endorse or oppose candidates, further amplifying the impact. This sophisticated use of nonprofit entities to orchestrate coordinated attacks can distort democratic processes, manipulate voter behavior, and ultimately work against the interests of the American people by prioritizing the agendas of a few over the many.
This weaponization is often concealed under the guise of legitimate nonprofit activities, making it difficult for the public to discern the true intentions behind these efforts. The lack of donor disclosure for many of these organizations further obscures accountability, allowing influential individuals or groups to operate behind the scenes. As a result, the power dynamics within the political arena can shift dramatically, with well-funded coalitions wielding disproportionate influence, potentially sidelining the voices and needs of ordinary citizens.
National Impact, The Moscow Project, Center for American Progress (CAP) and the CAP Action Fund
Imagine a scenario where local and national policies are covertly swayed by entities unknown to the general public, influencing elections and shaping the judicial landscape. This is not merely speculative; it's a reality with organizations like The Moscow Project and the Center for American Progress (CAP) Action Fund at the helm.
The coordination between the Center for American Progress (CAP), the CAP Action Fund, and the Moscow Project raises significant concerns about bias and transparency due to the blending of educational research and direct political advocacy.
The CAP, operating as a 501(c)(3), conducts extensive research and produces policy briefs on issues such as foreign interference in elections. This research, while intended to be educational, often aligns closely with the political agendas of its affiliated 501(c)(4) organizations, indicating a lack of objectivity. This close alignment undermines the perceived neutrality of CAP’s research, casting doubt on its legitimacy as a nonpartisan educational organization.
The CAP Action Fund, a 501(c)(4), takes CAP’s research and uses it to advocate for specific legislative measures. This arrangement allows CAP to benefit from the tax advantages of a 501(c)(3) while indirectly engaging in political advocacy through its sister organization. This relationship blurs the lines between unbiased research and political lobbying, as the CAP Action Fund’s efforts to influence legislation are based on research produced by an organization that is supposed to be nonpartisan. This blending of roles erodes trust in both entities, making it difficult to distinguish where educational efforts end, and political advocacy begins.
The Moscow Project, funded by the CAP Action Fund, focuses on investigating alleged ties between Trump and Russia. The project’s investigations are driven by political motives rather than a genuine pursuit of truth. The Moscow Project, supported by a politically active 501(c)(4), raises questions about the objectivity and impartiality of its findings. The focus on high-profile, politically charged topics appears to be an attempt to shape public opinion and influence political outcomes, rather than conducting unbiased investigations.
Overall, the intertwined operations of the CAP, the CAP Action Fund, and the Moscow Project demonstrate the challenges of maintaining clear boundaries between educational research and political advocacy. These entities, while legally distinct, function in a manner that leverages the advantages of both 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) statuses, potentially compromising their credibility and the integrity of their work. This blending of roles leads to skepticism about the true motivations behind their initiatives, undermining public trust in their purported educational and advocacy efforts.
Local Impact, George Soros and Local DA Elections
George Soros employs a sophisticated network of funding mechanisms, including Political Action Committees (PACs), 501(c)(3) organizations, and 501(c)(4) organizations, to support progressive district attorney (DA) candidates across the United States. Key among these is the Safety and Justice PAC, which channels significant amounts of money into local elections, providing a substantial advantage to Soros-backed candidates. Additionally, 501(c)(3) organizations such as the Open Society Foundations (OSF) and the Center for American Progress (CAP) conduct research and educational activities to promote policy goals. Meanwhile, 501(c)(4) organizations like the CAP Action Fund and America Votes engage in more direct political advocacy, including supporting or opposing candidates.
The influence of Soros-backed PACs extends through their substantial financial contributions, extensive advertising campaigns, and grassroots mobilization efforts. By investing millions of dollars into local DA races, these PACs can dramatically shift the balance in favor of progressive candidates. This financial clout often eclipses the funding available to other candidates, raising concerns about the outsized influence of wealthy individuals in local elections and the potential erosion of representative governance.
Several notable elections highlight the impact of Soros-supported DAs and the subsequent policy shifts. In Philadelphia, Larry Krasner's election, heavily funded by Soros, led to significant changes in the city's criminal justice policies, including reduced incarceration rates and an increased focus on rehabilitation over punishment. Similarly, Kim Foxx in Chicago, another beneficiary of Soros's financial backing, implemented policies aimed at criminal justice reform, such as declining to prosecute low-level offenses and emphasizing alternatives to incarceration.
The involvement of George Soros in local DA elections raises significant concerns. His financial interventions can undermine the integrity of local electoral processes by allowing a single wealthy individual to exert disproportionate influence over the outcomes. This centralized power can lead to the election of candidates who may prioritize progressive ideologies over the practical needs and safety concerns of their communities. The policies implemented by Soros-backed DAs are often seen as too lenient, potentially compromising public safety and contributing to rising crime rates in some areas.
While the support from George Soros has undeniably shaped local DA elections and propelled criminal justice reform, it also raises significant concerns about the fairness and transparency of electoral processes. The heavy financial involvement and resulting policy shifts highlight the complex interplay between money, politics, and justice in American society, underscoring the need for a balanced approach that considers both reform and public safety.
Moreover, the coordination between 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations maximizes their impact. For example, a 501(c)(3) might conduct research and develop policy recommendations, while 501(c)(4) advocates for these policies and supports candidates who endorse them. This coordination allows for a comprehensive approach to influence public policy and elections, leveraging both educational outreach and direct political advocacy.
The weaponization of NGOs, including those funded by Soros, involves pushing political narratives or policies under the guise of reform and advocacy, often influencing local and national governance. These tactics can undermine community priorities and constitutional processes, with many citizens unaware of the true affiliations and objectives of these NGOs. The lack of transparency about these NGOs' political motivations can lead to public mistrust and questions about the integrity of the electoral process.
The pervasive influence of entities like The Moscow Project and Soros-backed NGOs shapes local and national politics in ways that may not always reflect the community's best interests. These organizations use their resources to push specific agendas, often sidelining grassroots input and priorities.
Educating and Empowering Communities
Communities often remain unaware of how deeply certain NGOs, like The Moscow Project and those funded by George Soros, influence public policy and justice. To combat this, it is essential to launch awareness campaigns that go beyond mere information dissemination. By organizing interactive workshops and seminars in community centers and schools, residents can engage firsthand with the workings of these organizations. Distributing clear, concise materials—both print and online—that explain the roles and impacts of these NGOs can demystify their operations. Media partnerships can amplify this initiative, reaching a broader audience to raise a more informed electorate.
Transparency and Accountability
Transparency is fundamental to holding NGOs accountable. Advocating for legislation that demands these organizations disclose their funding sources, lobbying activities, and financial records is a step toward transparency. Such data should be accessible through publicly available annual reports, audited independently to ensure accuracy. Establishing a public registry that details the missions, activities, and financials of these NGOs can further enhance transparency. Public forums and town halls can serve as platforms for community members to voice their support for these measures, influencing local policymakers to adopt stricter regulations.
Community Action
Encouraging direct involvement in governance and policymaking is essential for mitigating the influence of NGOs driven by specific political agendas. Creating neighborhood committees that offer a direct line of communication to local officials can empower residents to influence local governance directly. Moreover, hosting policy hackathons and enabling community members to participate in participatory budgeting can involve them actively in decision-making processes, countering the outsized influence of powerful organizations.
Call to Action
It is imperative for citizens to become proactive in their community's governance to safeguard against overreaching political influences. By staying informed, participating in local government, and pushing for greater transparency, community members can ensure a more balanced representation of interests. Attend council meetings, engage with local advocacy groups, and take part in community planning to fortify the democratic process. Only through active and informed participation can communities ensure that their voices are heard and that policies reflect the collective will rather than the preferences of a powerful few.
Across the board Public exposure is needed of the NGO's that are paid tremendous amounts of Gov. money's to directly implement and facilitate the mass Illegal entry unto American soil and sponsorship in the "sanctuary city's & States" all undercover and hidden in plain sight...!
You have done your homework well. Lots of prayers needed for community and nation. Lots of work to do. I thank God for you and many others who love freedom. I’m old now but my grandkids will benefit. I’ve already seen much promising motion since 2016. When JFK was murdered in 1963 it felt like a unexpected gut punch. Regan gave me fresh air to help get through. Now we will see with God’s help what will happen.