The Conspiracy
UNDERMINING THE FREE WORLD, PART 2
Table of Contents
Part 7: The Guardians, the Discovery, the Plan
Part 8: Preparation
Preparation Phase (40 Years Before Selection of the President):
Year -4: Identifying the Candidate
Part 9: Trust The Guardian's Plan
Phase 1: Implementation (Starts with the Trump Presidency)
Presidency of Joe Biden, Waking up America
Phase 2: Implementation (The way it could go)
Part 10: The Rebuttal
Late Middle Ages to Renaissance (1400-1600): Banking Families Rise
20th Century (1900-1999): Continued Influence and Manipulation
What "We the People" Can Do Now
Educate Ourselves
Participate in Our Republic
Promote Transparency and Accountability
Challenge Misinformation
Build Community and Solidarity
Protect Constitutional Principles
Embrace Global Responsibility
Conclusion
Part 7: The Guardians, The Discovery, The Plan
Year -60: Initial Discovery of the Conspiracy (1963, during John F. Kennedy's presidency)
The year 1963, during John F. Kennedy's presidency, marked a turning point in the unfolding narrative of the United States as a corporate entity. It was in this year that a group known as "The Guardians" came into existence. Comprising scholars, legal experts, and former intelligence officers, "The Guardians" embarked on a mission to uncover the truth.
Their initial discovery was both profound and unsettling. Through meticulous examination of legal documents, treaties, financial records, and historical texts, they unearthed evidence of the corporate status of the United States. This revelation sent shock waves through their ranks, as they began to grasp the magnitude of the conspiracy that lay before them.
President Kennedy himself allegedly became aware of this conspiracy. Known for his commitment to justice and Constitutional Republic principles, Kennedy took decisive steps to challenge the corporate control that had insidiously woven itself into the fabric of American governance. His stance was bold and unyielding, a beacon of resistance in the face of a shadowy and powerful adversary.
However, this opposition would come at a great cost. On November 22, 1963, President Kennedy was assassinated, an event that sent ripples of grief and disbelief across the nation and the world. Within the context of this theory, Kennedy's assassination is seen not merely as a tragic loss but as a calculated response to his defiance of the corporate takeover.
The assassination added layers of secrecy and intrigue to the unfolding drama, casting a pall of suspicion and uncertainty over the events of that fateful day. It also served as a stark reminder of the stakes involved, as "The Guardians" continued their quest to expose the truth and wrest control from the hidden forces that sought to shape the destiny of the nation.
This chapter in the theory paints a picture of courage, determination, and a relentless pursuit of justice. It introduces us to the key players and events that would define the struggle against corporate control, setting the stage for the battles that lay ahead. It is a tale of heroes and villains, of truth and deception, and of a nation grappling with its identity in the face of an unseen and formidable foe.
Year -59 to -40: Research and Analysis:
The years following the initial discovery were marked by a period of intense research and analysis. "The Guardians" embarked on a journey to unravel the intricate web that had been woven around the corporate status of the United States. This was a time of intellectual rigor, relentless inquiry, and strategic planning.
From Year -59 to -50, the focus was on in-depth research into the mechanisms that established and maintained the corporate status. This involved a comprehensive analysis of legal frameworks, financial structures, and historical context. The task was monumental, requiring a synthesis of diverse fields of knowledge and an understanding of complex interconnections. The goal was to uncover the underlying principles and practices that had given rise to this unprecedented situation.
In the subsequent years, from Year -49 to -45, the emphasis shifted to the identification of key players, organizations, and governments that held or benefited from the corporate status. This phase involved mapping connections and influence, tracing the lines of power that extended across borders and penetrated various sectors of society. It was a detective's work, piecing together a puzzle that revealed the contours of a hidden landscape.
Finally, from Year -44 to -40, the focus turned to the development of a strategic plan. This was a time of synthesis and foresight, as "The Guardians" outlined legal, financial, and security strategies to dismantle the corporate status. They identified potential allies and obstacles, anticipating challenges and opportunities that lay ahead. This was a blueprint for action, a roadmap that would guide their efforts in the coming years.
This period of research and analysis was foundational to the mission of "The Guardians." It provided them with the insights, tools, and strategies they needed to confront a formidable adversary. It was a time of preparation, a crucible in which ideas were tested, alliances were forged, and a vision was shaped. It was the groundwork for a battle that would be waged in the shadows, a struggle for the soul of a nation, and a quest for truth and justice in the face of overwhelming odds.
Part 8: Preparation
Preparation Phase (40 Years Before Selection of the President):
Year -39 to -20: Building a Network
During this phase, a network was meticulously constructed. Individuals from various fields such as law, finance, military, and politics were recruited, ensuring a diverse array of expertise. The recruits underwent specialized training in intelligence gathering, cybersecurity, legal analysis, and political strategy. This was the foundation, the assembly of a team with the skills and knowledge necessary to embark on a mission of this magnitude.
Year -19 to -15: Covert Operations
The next phase was marked by covert operations. Surveillance was conducted on key players benefiting from the corporate status, including tracking financial transactions and political connections. Information was gathered through undercover operations, hacking, and legal research. This was a time of shadows and secrets, a dance of intrigue and espionage.
Year -14 to -10: Financial Preparation
Financial preparation was the focus of this phase. Businesses and investments were established to secretly fund operations, including the creation of shell companies and offshore accounts. Measures were taken to protect assets from discovery and seizure, including legal barriers and encrypted financial systems. This was the financial architecture that would support the mission, a fortress built to withstand scrutiny and attack.
Year -9 to -5: Political Strategy
The political strategy was developed during this phase. The political landscape was analyzed to identify allies and opponents, including profiling politicians and assessing public sentiment. Influence was exerted on legislation at both state and federal levels to prepare for legal challenges and reforms, including lobbying and strategic alliances. Public outreach was conducted to counter media narratives, and the Q program was set up, evaluated, and war gamed. This was a game theory and media counter narrative program, played with precision and foresight.
Year -4: Identifying the Candidate
The search for a candidate began in earnest during this phase. An individual with integrity, charisma, and courage was sought, including background checks and psychological assessments. Thorough vetting was conducted to ensure freedom from influence or compromise, including financial audits and security clearance. This was the search for a leader, a figure who would embody the mission and inspire the movement.
Year -3: Preparing the Candidate
The chosen candidate was prepared during this phase. They were briefed on the conspiracy and mission, including detailed explanations of the evidence and plan. Intensive training was provided in public speaking, political strategy, legal matters, and intelligence operations, including simulations and coaching. This was the crucible, a time of transformation and empowerment.
Year -2: Grassroots Movement
A grassroots movement was initiated during this phase. Public engagement was fostered to raise awareness, including community organizing and social media campaigns. A media strategy was developed to counter disinformation and promote transparency, including press relations and content creation. This was the awakening, a call to action that resonated with the hearts and minds of the people.
Year -1: Election Campaign
The election campaign was launched during this phase. The focus was on integrity, transparency, and constitutional principles, including speeches, debates, and advertising. Measures were taken to protect the campaign from sabotage, disinformation, and espionage, including security protocols and crisis management. This was the final push, a battle fought in the public arena, with the stakes higher than ever before.
This hypothetical plan would represent one of the most complex and challenging undertakings in history, requiring coordination across legal, financial, political, and security domains. It would likely face significant resistance and unforeseen challenges. The success of such a plan would hinge on careful planning, unwavering commitment, broad collaboration, and the ability to adapt to a constantly changing landscape. It would be a testament to human ingenuity, resilience, and the unyielding pursuit of justice.
Part 9: Trust The Guardian's Plan
Phase 1: Implementation (Starts with the Presidency)
Legal Actions
During the Trump administration, legal actions were pursued with a clear and strategic purpose. These weren't just random legal battles; they were part of a broader plan to removing corporate status of the United States and restore the original principles of the republic. From the appointment of Supreme Court justices who uphold the Constitution to the renegotiation of international agreements like NAFTA, every step was taken with the goal of dismantling the alleged corporate status of the nation.
These actions are real and well-documented. They reflect a commitment to the rule of law and a determination to reclaim the nation's sovereignty. Critics may dismiss this interpretation, but for those of us who see the bigger picture, the connection is clear. The legal landscape was reshaped, not for personal or political gain, but to restore the integrity and constitutional foundation of our great nation.
The fight to removing corporate status of the United States is a complex and multifaceted undertaking. It requires not just legal and economic reforms but also administrative and structural changes within the government itself. The implementation of Schedule F, for example, was a bold step in this direction, allowing for a more efficient government aligned with this overarching plan. It's a battle that demands courage, conviction, and unwavering commitment to the principles that make America great. Although these are real actions that Trump took, some could theorize that it could have been geared towards removing corporate status of the United States.
Trump's Success in Taking the U.S. Out of Corporate Status (2018)
In 2018, under the Trump administration, the U.S. is said to have successfully exited its corporate status. This monumental shift would entail a comprehensive review and restructuring of legal frameworks, financial systems, and international agreements. It would require renegotiating treaties, redefining the role of the Federal Reserve, and implementing legal reforms to restore the constitutional republic. The process would be complex, involving collaboration with international partners, extensive legal battles, and careful navigation of economic implications. This success is seen as a pivotal moment in the plan, a triumph over the alleged corporate control, and a significant step toward restoring the nation's original principles.
Financial Reforms
During the Trump administration, financial reforms were implemented, including tax cuts and deregulation, aimed at stimulating economic growth. Some observers have interpreted these actions as part of a broader strategy to break the alleged corporate control over the nation. While this theory is not universally accepted, proponents argue that these reforms were targeted moves to dismantle the structures that have allowed the supposed corporate status to persist.
Critics of the administration's financial reforms often focus on the potential benefits to the wealthy or large corporations. However, those who subscribe to the theory of a plan to removing corporate status of the United States see these actions in a different light. They view the tax cuts and deregulation as tools to level the economic playing field and restore balance, rather than as mere economic policies.
The idea that the administration's financial reforms were part of a concerted effort to removing corporate status of the United States is a complex and nuanced one. It involves not just legal and economic considerations but also a deep understanding of the alleged hidden forces that have shaped the nation's financial system. While not everyone agrees with this interpretation, it has become a significant part of the discourse surrounding the Trump administration's economic policies.
Public Engagement
Public engagement became a defining feature of the Trump era, marked by the President's prolific use of social media and the emergence of the Q movement on October 27, 2017. This engagement was interpreted by some as a concerted effort to rally the people and awaken a collective consciousness about the alleged corporate status of the nation, along with concerns about widespread corruption and the exploitation of children both in the U.S. and worldwide.
The Q movement, in particular, emerged as a vital force in public discourse during the Trump era. It served as a platform for sharing information and theories that aligned with the idea of dismantling the supposed corporate control over the country. The movement was not about creating division but rather about bypassing mainstream media, which many believe to be untruthful. It found a dedicated following among those awakened to the need for a radical transformation of the political and economic system.
The combination of President Trump's direct communication with the public and the rise of the Q movement created a dynamic environment. It fostered a sense of urgency and purpose among those who felt that the time had come to confront the alleged hidden forces shaping the nation's destiny. This was not about division but about awakening to truths that had been obscured or distorted.
This era of public engagement, marked by the President's use of social media and the influence of the Q movement, represents a significant shift in political consciousness for many. It's seen as a positive awakening, a rallying cry for those who seek transparency, integrity, and a return to foundational principles. The impact of this movement continues to resonate, reflecting a deep desire for change and a rejection of narratives that some perceive as false or misleading.
Diplomatic Negotiations
Diplomatic negotiations were conducted with foreign governments and international organizations, resulting in new treaties and agreements, such as renegotiating NAFTA. Diplomatic negotiations were a prominent feature of the Trump administration's approach to international relations. These negotiations were not merely routine diplomatic endeavors but were seen by some as part of a broader strategy to dismantle the alleged corporate control over the nation. The renegotiation of NAFTA, for example, was not just about trade but about reasserting national sovereignty and breaking away from agreements that may have been influenced by those who hold this supposed corporate status.
These diplomatic efforts were about more than just economics; they were about redefining America's place in the world in alignment with the mission to restore the constitutional republic. The administration's willingness to engage in tough negotiations and to challenge existing international agreements was seen as a bold move to reclaim control from hidden interests. Whether one agrees with this perspective or not, the impact of these diplomatic negotiations continues to shape international relations and domestic policy, reflecting a determination to prioritize America's interests and values.
Unemployment
During the Trump administration, unemployment was a focal point of economic policy. Efforts were made to stimulate job growth through deregulation, tax cuts, and other pro-business measures. Some supporters of the administration argue that these policies were part of a broader strategy to wrest control from the alleged corporate entities that might have been manipulating the economy.
The results of these policies were evident in the declining unemployment rates prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The administration's approach to unemployment was not merely about numbers but about empowering the American workforce and challenging the status quo that some believe was influenced by hidden corporate interests.
However, the COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented challenges to the labor market. The administration's response included stimulus packages aimed at supporting businesses and workers affected by the pandemic. These actions were seen by some as consistent with the overarching goal of breaking the control of those who allegedly hold corporate status over the nation, by directly aiding the American people during a time of crisis.
Energy
Energy policy under the Trump administration was marked by a shift towards energy independence and the promotion of domestic energy production. Some interpret these policies as part of a plan to dismantle the supposed corporate control over the nation, by reducing reliance on foreign energy and empowering domestic producers.
The administration's support for the fossil fuel industry, deregulation, and withdrawal from international agreements like the Paris Climate Accord were seen as bold moves to reclaim national sovereignty. These actions were not without controversy, but they reflected a determination to prioritize America's energy needs and economic interests.
The focus on energy independence was not just about economics but about redefining America's energy future. Whether one agrees with this approach or not, the impact of these energy policies continues to shape the national and global energy landscape, reflecting a commitment to American values and interests.
2020 Election and Transition
President Trump's loss in the 2020 election was seen by some as a planned event, a strategic move within the larger plan. The transition to the Biden administration marked a shift but was perceived as part of the ongoing strategy. The 2020 election and subsequent transition were fraught with controversy and tension. President Trump's handling of the transition, however, was seen by some as an effort to ensure integrity and transparency in the face of potential irregularities. His challenges to the election results were viewed by supporters as part of his commitment to the rule of law and the principles of the republic.
Despite the heated rhetoric and legal battles, the transition of power was ultimately carried out. Some argue that President Trump's actions during this period, including his response to the events of January 6th, demonstrated a commitment to mitigating unrest and maintaining order. He was vocal in his condemnation of violence and worked to prevent further escalation.
The 2020 election and transition will likely be remembered as a defining moment in American political history. The way President Trump navigated this complex and contentious period reflects a determination to confront challenges head-on. Whether one views his actions as commendable or controversial, they were consistent with his approach to governance and his mission to confront what some believe to be the hidden forces shaping the nation's destiny.
Presidency of Joe Biden, Waking up America
Energy and Environmental Policies
Biden's approach to energy and environmental policies has been met with mixed reactions. While some praise the administration's commitment to addressing climate change and rejoining international agreements like the Paris Accord, others criticize the impact on domestic energy industries. The cancellation of the Keystone XL pipeline, for example, has been seen by some as a blow to energy independence and job creation. Additionally, rising gas prices and concerns over energy supply have fueled discontent, leading to questions about the administration's ability to balance environmental goals with economic realities.
Social and Cultural Divide
The Biden administration has also faced challenges in navigating the deep social and cultural divides that have become increasingly pronounced in recent years. Efforts to promote equity and social justice have been met with resistance from some segments of the population, leading to polarized debates over issues like critical race theory, voting rights, and gun control. The administration's stance on these and other matters has been perceived by some as overly partisan, contributing to a lack of consensus and further entrenching divisions. The challenge of fostering unity and bridging these divides remains a significant obstacle."
Healthcare and Infrastructure
Despite ambitious proposals for healthcare reform and infrastructure investment, the Biden administration has encountered difficulties in advancing these key priorities. The complexity of the healthcare system, coupled with differing opinions within the Democratic Party and strong opposition from Republicans, has hindered progress on meaningful reform. Similarly, the push for a comprehensive infrastructure package has been bogged down by disagreements over scope, funding, and priorities. These challenges highlight the intricate dynamics of governance and the difficulties in achieving bipartisan cooperation on major policy initiatives.
These passages aim to provide a nuanced view of the perceived challenges and failures during Biden's Presidency, reflecting a range of opinions and concerns. It's important to note that perspectives on these issues can vary widely, and the interpretation of success or failure often depends on individual values, beliefs, and political affiliations.
COVID-19
During Biden's problem Presidency, a series of challenges and perceived failures have come to the forefront. The administration has faced criticism on various fronts, including the handling of the Afghanistan withdrawal, the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, rising inflation, and concerns over border security. The administration's COVID-19 response has been questioned by some, particularly regarding vaccine distribution and messaging. Economic challenges, such as rising inflation and supply chain disruptions, have further eroded confidence in the administration's ability to manage the economy effectively.
Afghanistan
The withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan in 2021 has become a defining and deeply problematic moment in the Biden administration's foreign policy. The decision to leave Afghanistan, while fulfilling a campaign promise, was executed in a manner that many view as a significant failure.
The rapid collapse of the Afghan government and the Taliban's swift takeover of Kabul led to a chaotic and desperate evacuation effort. The situation was marked by confusion, violence, and tragic loss of life, including the deaths of 13 U.S. service members.
Critics argue that Biden's handling of the withdrawal was not just poorly planned but fundamentally flawed. The abandonment of Bagram Air Base, the failure to anticipate the Afghan military's collapse, and the inability to secure a more orderly transition are seen as evidence of a profound strategic failure.
The chaotic withdrawal caught thousands of U.S. citizens, Afghan allies, and other vulnerable individuals in a dangerous and untenable situation. The process was marred by missteps and inefficiencies that many attribute directly to the administration's lack of foresight and planning.
In the eyes of many, Biden's handling of Afghanistan represents more than a policy mistake; it is seen as a failure of leadership, judgment, and responsibility. The situation has raised serious questions about the U.S.'s commitment to its allies, the value placed on human rights, and the competence of those charged with executing critical foreign policy decisions.
The full impact of this failure on Afghanistan, the region, and U.S. foreign policy is still unfolding. However, the consensus among many observers is clear: Biden's handling of the Afghanistan withdrawal was a significant misstep, one that will likely remain a stain on his presidency and a subject of intense scrutiny and criticism for years to come
The withdrawal from Afghanistan was marked by chaos and a lack of coordination, leading to a hurried evacuation and leaving many allies and Afghan citizens at risk.
Boarder
On the immigration front, the handling of the southern border has been a contentious issue, with critics arguing that policies have led to a surge in illegal crossings and a humanitarian crisis. Additionally, the administration's approach to foreign policy, particularly with regard to China and Russia, has been viewed by some as lacking a clear and coherent strategy.
These issues, among others, have contributed to a perception of a problem Presidency, with critics arguing that the administration has failed to deliver on key promises and has struggled to navigate the complex and multifaceted challenges facing the nation. The debate continues to rage, reflecting deep divisions and differing perspectives on the direction of the country and the leadership needed to address its most pressing concerns.
Public Response and Awakening
The perceived failures and controversies of the Biden administration, coupled with the legal challenges faced by Trump and the alleged success of the 2018 exit from corporate status, become focal points for public discourse and awakening. The narrative suggests that these events were anticipated and are part of a strategic plan to awaken the public to the alleged hidden truths. Grassroots movements, social media campaigns, and public engagement continue to grow, reflecting a broader awakening of "We the People."
Biden’s Presidency I speculate will conclude with a heightened awareness and awakening among the public. The interplay between actual events and the hypothetical framework reflects the views of those who subscribe to this theory. The narrative portrays a complex and multifaceted concept, weaving together legal, political, and economic elements to present a comprehensive view of this theoretical perspective.
Phase 3: Triumph and Transformation (Starts with the Presidency of Donald Trump, 2024)
Election Victory
The 2024 election sees the triumphant return of Donald Trump to the presidency. His victory is seen as a vindication of the plan and a rejection of the alleged corporate entity's influence. The election itself is fraught with tension, controversy, and intense public engagement. It's a battle not just for political power but for the soul of the nation. Trump utilizes a different strategy in his second presidency. He chooses the ones that he trusts and knows can get the job done as part of his cabinet instead of career politicians. With the legal issues behind him, he can now start doing work for the American people and show us what he can really do.
Final Legal Actions and Constitutional Restoration
With President Trump returning to office, the concluding legal actions are initiated to dismantle any remaining traces of the purported corporate status. Constitutional amendments are thoughtfully proposed and ardently advocated for, with the aim of restoring the original principles of the republic. This represents the final legal push, a concerted and deliberate effort to reclaim the nation's sovereignty and integrity.
As a president committed to the rule of law, Trump begins a rigorous crackdown on corruption, implementing comprehensive overhauls within the FBI and numerous other federal agencies. Utilizing Schedule F, he manages to streamline the executive branch, effectively eliminating unnecessary or redundant elements. This action symbolizes a return to efficiency and accountability, reflecting a governance model that prioritizes the nation's core values and interests
Implementation of Schedule F
In this phase, the administration implements Schedule F, a significant reform that grants the President enhanced authority in hiring and firing federal employees in key policy-making positions. This change is perceived as a strategic maneuver to ensure that those occupying critical roles align with the mission to dismantle the alleged corporate status and restore the constitutional republic.
The introduction of Schedule F is met with a diverse array of responses, both laudatory and critical. Proponents contend that it fosters a more efficient and responsive government, empowering the President to sculpt the administration in harmony with the overarching plan. Critics, on the other hand, express apprehensions about potential politicization and the erosion of protections for career civil servants. Some even go so far as to declare that Schedule F will "slaughter the Shadow Government," a phrase that captures the intensity of the sentiment and the perceived necessity of the action.
The incorporation of Schedule F into the plan symbolizes a bold and contentious step, mirroring the complexity and subtlety of the endeavor. It emphasizes the multifaceted nature of the strategy, which encompasses not merely legal and economic reforms but also intricate administrative and structural modifications within the government itself. This nuanced approach reflects a profound understanding of the challenges and opportunities inherent in such a transformative undertaking.
Economic Reforms and Equitable Growth
The administration implements a series of economic reforms designed to promote equitable growth and financial stability. These include restructuring financial institutions, renegotiating international agreements, and implementing policies that prioritize the well-being of "We the People." It's an economic renaissance, a rebirth of prosperity guided by principles of fairness and opportunity.
Rebuilding Trust and Enhancing Transparency
Efforts are redoubled to rebuild trust in institutions and enhance transparency in governance. Measures are taken to ensure accountability, public participation, and oversight. This is the healing phase, a time to mend the fractures, restore faith, and strengthen the bond between the government and the governed.
Global Diplomacy and New Alliances
The administration engages in global diplomacy, forging new alliances, and renegotiating treaties. The focus is on isolating or neutralizing any remaining foreign influence tied to the alleged corporate status. This is the dance of international relations, a repositioning of the U.S. on the world stage, guided by a vision of sovereignty and mutual respect.
Public Engagement and Collective Consciousness
The public continues to play a vital role, with grassroots movements, media engagement, and transparent communication fostering a collective consciousness. The awakening reaches its zenith, a realization of shared values, shared purpose, and shared destiny.
Conclusion: A New Dawn
The plan concludes with the full restoration of the constitutional republic, the rebuilding of trust in institutions, the stabilization of the economy, and the repositioning of the U.S. in the global community. It's a new dawn, a time of renewal, a triumph of ideals over hidden agendas. It's a story of resilience, determination, and the unyielding pursuit of justice. It's a testament to the power of "We the People," a celebration of the human spirit, and a renaissance of the nation's soul.
Many of President Trump's actions could be interpreted as attempts to extricate the United States from its alleged corporate status. It is not unreasonable to argue that these were his intentions, and the narratives supporting such theories are indeed compelling. However, a comprehensive examination requires us to consider alternative perspectives before arriving at such a conclusion.
I personally hold the view that the challenges we face in this country stem from our own deficiencies in leadership and understanding, as well as a dearth of honest politicians. The notion that we should attribute our shortcomings and difficulties to a foreign crown potentially owning us, or to the idea of our nation being incorporated, seems misplaced to me.
Regardless of these theories, the path forward for the American people remains the same. Our focus should be on fostering responsible leadership, promoting transparency, and working collectively to uphold the values that define our nation. Whether or not one subscribes to the idea of corporate control, our responsibilities as citizens remain unchanged.
Part 10: The Rebuttal
In this intellectual exploration, we have embarked on a hypothetical journey, examining various conspiracy theories that have permeated certain segments of public discourse. The purpose of this exercise was not to endorse or promote these theories but to engage in a mental exercise, to envision how these theories might unfold, how they could be countered, and what monumental tasks would be required to reverse such theoretical constructs.
One of the principal contentions I present concerning these theories involves the historical timeline. The emergence of the Vatican, the Knights Templar, and the rise of banking families during the Middle Ages all predate the founding of the United States by nearly 500 years.
While I acknowledge the significance of this history, I find it to be somewhat inconsequential in the context of our current discussion. The challenges we face today are distinctly modern, and thus, dwelling on these distant historical phenomena may not provide us with the insights necessary to address contemporary issues.
The scenarios presented were crafted with an eye towards plausibility, grounded in events and ideas that could conceivably have transpired. Yet, it is essential to recognize that these narratives are fictional constructs, imaginative interpretations of complex and often misunderstood phenomena.
Others may have different perspectives, adding to or subtracting from these narratives, and that is the nature of intellectual inquiry. The point is not to arrive at a definitive conclusion but to stimulate thought, to challenge assumptions, and to foster a deeper understanding of the complexities involved.
Now that we have painted a somewhat vivid picture of how these conspiracies could have been real, we will proceed to explore rebuttals to these theories. The choice of what to believe in is ultimately yours, and the intention here is to provide you with the tools to make an informed decision.
Again, the purpose of this exercise is to give you a mental framework for how these theories would potentially work, how they would manifest, and what would be needed to reverse them. Understanding the monumental task that it would take to reverse such theories is crucial.
It is my opinion, one that I have expressed many times, that these theories did not happen. But as you will see in the last part, what we do as people doesn't change, no matter what. Either way, it's time to unite. It's time to take our country back from anyone who thinks they have it. Nobody owns us. We need our pride back; we need our love for our country back. We must understand that the poison within it is the politicians and our enemies that are against us, not America. We are America. Keep that in mind, patriots. For more in-depth information about why I believe we are not a U.S. corporation, you can find more in-depth details in my article here. my article here.
1302: Papal Bull "Unam Sanctam".
In the year 1302, the Papal Bull "Unam Sanctam" was issued. This assertion of spiritual authority was a theological claim, not a legal or political mechanism for global control. No evidence supports the existence of universal control over the world's souls or governments. The Church's influence varied widely and was often challenged by secular authorities. The idea of a groundwork for future control is speculative and unsupported by historical evidence. It's essential to recognize that laws and regulations can be shaped, and the people must remain vigilant against potential manipulations.
1302-1600: Spiritual and Financial Influence
From 1302 to 1600, the spiritual and financial influence of the Church was evident. The people's response included religious reform movements, questioning of Church authority, and the rise of secular governance. They challenged religious dogma and supported alternative financial systems, reflecting a democratic spirit. An example of this is the Protestant Reformation led by Martin Luther in the 16th century, which led to the weakening of the Church's control, fostering of individualism, and decentralization of financial power. It's a reminder that the people's voice can be a powerful force against centralized control.
1312: Suppression of the Knights Templar
In 1312, the suppression of the Knights Templar occurred. This complex political and religious event was not a financial conspiracy. There is no credible evidence to support the formation of a secret financial network. The Church's control over European banking is exaggerated and oversimplified. It's worth noting that laws and regulations may be influenced by those in power, and vigilance is required to ensure fairness and transparency. The suppression of the Templar’s has been mythologized but lacks basis in a hidden power narrative.
1400-1600 Late Middle Ages to Renaissance: Banking Families Rise
During the Late Middle Ages to the Renaissance (1400-1600), banking families rose to prominence. They operated within the legal and political frameworks of their time, not as part of a global conspiracy. However, it's important to recognize that those with significant financial influence may bend rules or engage in regulatory capture. Alignment with the Vatican is overstated and ignores the conflicts and competition that existed. International banking networks were not monolithic or controlled by a single group. The complexity of these networks defies simplistic narratives. The rise of corporate structures was a legal and economic development, not a secretive plot. Yet, the creation of laws and regulations by those with vested interests is a concern that requires ongoing scrutiny and awareness.
These historical analyses provide a nuanced understanding of the events and trends, recognizing the complexities and resisting oversimplification. They also underscore the importance of vigilance, awareness, and active engagement in shaping a just and transparent society. The lessons of history remind us that power can be challenged, that laws can be shaped, and that the people's voice can be a potent force for change. The watchful eye of the citizenry must remain fixed on those who wield power, ensuring that the rules are not bent to favor the few at the expense of the many.
1700s: Enlightenment and Nation-States Formation
In the 1700s, the Enlightenment and the rise of nation-states marked a significant shift in human thought and governance. Secret societies, often viewed with suspicion, had limited influence and were often philosophical or social in nature. The embedding of corporate structures is a misinterpretation of legal and economic evolution, not a hidden agenda. Enlightenment ideas were diverse and often opposed to centralized control. Claims of elite manipulation of political revolutions lack historical support and oversimplify complex events. It's worth noting that laws and regulations can be influenced by those with power, and the people must remain vigilant against potential manipulations.
During this period, the people's response was characterized by participation in intellectual discourse, revolutions, and constitutional principles. They shaped political ideologies and formed new governments. An example of this is the Great Awakening during the 1740s, sparking religious revival and constitutional thinking. The effect was the emergence of constitutional governance, reduction of elite control, and promotion of human rights.
1776: U.S. Declaration of Independence
In 1776, U.S. Independence was declared. The people fought for independence, drafted the Constitution, and established republican governance. They broke from colonial rule and created a representative government. The drafting and ratification of the U.S. Constitution established a constitutional republic, limiting foreign financial influence, and empowering citizens. The U.S. broke from British control through a well-documented political process, not a hidden financial scheme. The Founding Fathers were influenced by a wide range of ideas, not a single conspiracy. The new government was founded on constitutional principles, not corporate control. European banking influence is exaggerated and misunderstands international finance.
1800s: Gradual Financial Manipulation
In the 1800s, claims of gradual financial manipulation emerged. These claims of infiltration and influence over U.S. financial institutions are speculative and lack evidence. Monetary policy was shaped by a variety of factors, not a single corporate agenda. National banks operated within legal frameworks, not as part of an international conspiracy. Economic policies were complex and cannot be reduced to a simple narrative of elite control. However, the influence of wealthy individuals and families on laws and regulations should not be overlooked. The potential for bending rules, regulatory capture, and revolving door practices must be recognized and guarded against.
1871: Organic Act – Alleged Incorporation of the U.S.
In 1871, the Organic Act was passed, a piece of legislation often misunderstood. It related to the governance of Washington, D.C., not the incorporation of the U.S. There is no evidence of secret incorporation or alignment with international banking. Legal changes were public and can be understood within the context of U.S. governance. The idea of hidden incorporation is a misinterpretation of legal terminology and context. It's essential to recognize that laws can be shaped by those in power, and the citizenry must remain watchful for potential manipulations.
1800s-1900s: Financial Developments
During the 1800s and 1900s, financial developments led to various responses from the people. Labor movements, financial reforms, and political engagement were the hallmarks of this era. The people influenced economic policies and advocated regulations. An example of this is the Populist Movement of the late 19th century, advocating for farmers and laborers. The effect was the regulation of corporate power, democratization of economic policy, and protection of workers' rights.
1913: Federal Reserve Act
In 1913, the Federal Reserve Act was passed. The Federal Reserve was created to stabilize the banking system, not to cement corporate control. The centralized banking system operates under government oversight, not hidden influence. Claims of European banking family control are unfounded and misunderstand the Federal Reserve's structure. Control over currency and interest rates is a normal function of central banking, not evidence of a conspiracy. However, the influence of wealthy families and banks on laws and regulations should not be overlooked, and the people must remain vigilant against potential bending of rules.
20th Century (1900-1999): Continued Influence and Manipulation.
Throughout the 20th century, claims of continued influence and manipulation arose. Secret agreements and corporate control are speculative claims without evidence. Lobbying and influence are part of the political process but do not equate to hidden governance. Alignment with global financial institutions is a normal part of international economics. Executive orders are public and subject to legal review, not tools for secret corporate governance.
During this period, the people's response was characterized by civic engagement, protests, voting, and political discourse. They shaped public policy, elected representatives, and demanded transparency. An example of this is the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, fighting for racial equality and justice. The effect was the expansion of civil rights, curbing of corporate influence, and strengthening of constitutional institutions.
1980-1990: Executive Order Granting Corporate Status
During the 1980s and 1990s, a theory emerged that an Executive Order had been issued, transforming the U.S. into a corporation. However, no U.S. President has issued such an order. The idea of a legal transformation into a corporation is a misunderstanding of legal principles. Alignment with global corporate interests is a vague claim without substantiation. Executive actions are subject to checks and balances and cannot fundamentally alter the U.S. government. It's worth noting that while the law may appear to be followed, the influence of wealthy individuals and families who may bend the rules should not be overlooked. The citizenry must remain vigilant and aware of potential manipulations.
21st Century (2000-Present): Ongoing Corporate Governance
In the 21st century, claims of ongoing corporate governance in the U.S. have persisted. The U.S. does not operate under a hidden corporate governance model. Claims of continued manipulation lack evidence and misunderstand the complexity of governance. Policies are shaped by constitutional processes, not hidden corporate interests. Resistance movements are part of the constitutional process, not evidence of suppression or hidden control. Again, the influence of powerful entities on laws and regulations should be considered, and the people must remain watchful for potential bending of rules.
Modern challenges have led to various responses from the people. Activism, education, and constitutional processes have been the tools of engagement. The people have influenced policies, held leaders accountable, and promoted public interest. An example of this is the rise of grassroots movements like Occupy Wall Street, challenging corporate influence. The effect has been increased awareness of corporate influence, promotion of transparency, and reinforcement of constitutional values.
These insights provide a comprehensive understanding of the legal and political landscape. They recognize the complexities of governance and the role of various actors in shaping policies and institutions. They also underscore the importance of vigilance, critical thinking, and active engagement in maintaining a just and transparent society. The lessons of history remind us that power can be challenged, that laws can be shaped, and that the people's voice can be a potent force for change. The watchful eye of the citizenry must remain fixed on those who wield power, ensuring that the rules are not bent to favor the few at the expense of the many.
What "We the People" Can Do Now
Reclaiming Our Choke point: A Call to Action for a Stronger America
I continue to return to the theme of "you may not like what I'm going to say," but I do so with purpose. This is my profession, my calling. I observe performance, and I provide tools to enhance it. I believe I have some skill in this area, so I entreat you one last time to consider my perspective, or at least try to understand it. Yesterday, I released an article in which I asserted that the United States is not a corporation. More importantly, I emphasized that there are more pressing issues we should be addressing rather than squabbling over who is right. When I observe my comments, I prefer to be spontaneous, to speak plainly and react naturally.
I was impassioned because for seven months, I've been repeating the same narrative, one that seems to be misunderstood by my moral ethos. I am unaccustomed to quitting, to seeing situations as impossible, or to feeling apathy and frustration like a petulant teenager. I know I am being blunt, but I strive to do so professionally. The truth is, we are the most spoiled society on this planet. We have forgotten the way and means by which our total comfort has been achieved. I believe that the malevolent forces that have shaped this world throughout history have seeded theories that produce very specific outcomes. If you fail to see this, I urge you to open your eyes, for it is deeply concerning and threatens to bring our nation to its knees.
This is not mere theory; it is fact. Decentralized government, without the active participation of its constituents, fails. This is indisputable. We must cease to be ensnared by the narratives spun by the elites, the Illuminati, the New World Order, the crowns, the Vatican. This is my reality, my vision, and I am confident in its accuracy. When I tell you this, you gnash your teeth. Why? I believe you know why. We stand on a unique precipice, on the verge of the greatest awakening. Yet, it is being disrupted, obscured, and thwarted by these fragments of useless theories.
My observations are not without concern, for I see a troubling blend of confusion, arrogance, and ignorance, all conspiring to wish the worst for our nation. All the while, our true enemies slip past unnoticed, right through our choke points. If you doubt my words, look to your schools, observe what has been permitted to transpire there. Examine your crime statistics, the number of children who vanish daily, our monetary system, our energy policies, our corporate structures, our regulatory scars. We have allowed this to happen.
In a decentralized system, non-participation leads to decay, a rot so profound that it defies comprehension. Yet, we are not in a situation as dire as some would have you believe. If we were, there would be no courts, no law and order, no peace. You would not be able to walk in the park, walk your dog, or visit the store. Some seem to relish the idea that we are in a bad spot, perhaps to excuse their inaction. They complain, identifying problems without solutions, creating in their minds an impossible scenario. This is our first problem; one we must understand and rectify. Many, perhaps driven by arrogance, may gnash their teeth at my words.
But this is not arrogance on my part; it is the result of months of observation, research, and watching every theory in the United States lead nowhere, promote nothing. If you think I am wrong, prove it. Tell me what positive measures have come from theories such as the United States being a corporation, or Devolution, or martial law, or sovereign citizen, or Admiralty law? What has come of them? You generalize the issues without identifying the real problems. Deep down, you know I am right. Deep down, you know what you are supposed to do. If you do not, you are part of the reason we find ourselves here. Remember, the only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. Stand ready, for the battle is ours, and the time for action is now. We are born with rights, not merely as citizens but as children of God. Yet, these rights are not inviolable as many may think.
People forget human history that these rights can be usurped by tyrants and evil men. This truth has been etched into the annals of human history, and yet, it seems, many forget. Natural law, a concept understood by those who ponder the essence of justice, only holds sway when good men enforce it. Who then shall stand against the evil men, those who care not for natural law or who subscribe to their own twisted interpretation? As some may be too young or naive to comprehend, a fair, logical, and fundamentally based governance is essential. The United States, regardless of how one may choose to spell it, has proven to be the most effective system in human history, so long as it is followed, enforced, and justly applied. Who, then, shall keep it in check? It is we, the people.
What I aim to convey is this profound truth: the freedoms we claim are not without cost. Freedom demands responsibility, sacrifice, effort, coordination, organization, and in some dire instances, bloodshed. We must focus on core fundamentals, not selfish desires or debates over the right system. This system, though broken by our collective neglect, remains the best in the world. We must concentrate on what can be fixed, not what we merely hope for. To those who argue that we are owned by the crown, I vehemently disagree and stand ready to prove otherwise. But if that were the case, and even with what I present as fact, what then would be the solution? I ask you to consider, what is the choke point? It is the place where every enemy must pass no matter who it is: your front yard, your block, your community, your town, your city, your county. Freedom is preserved, gained, and earned at this choke point.
So, I ask you again, what are you doing in that vital area? The solution is simple: your effort, your attention, your organization, your communities. Are you willing to sacrifice and do what is needed? Or are you making excuses, waiting for things to crumble into a situation beyond your wildest fears? A situation where the smells, the sounds, the sights would be unrecognizable. Trust me, I know. Just as every other combat veteran knows. We are spoiled to the core, stomping our feet in childish frustration, doing nothing. Our problem is that we are not identifying the right problems. What is it again? Secure that choke point, your front yard. Stand ready, for the battle if your courage allows it, is ours.
I know that many of you may take issue with my content or perhaps my delivery. This confounds me, for I am proficient in my field. I have served as a mentor, advisor, policy maker, and have crafted doctrine and procedures for an extremely perilous profession. I will not abandon you; I will continue to provide you with this expertise. You may perceive it as arrogance, or dismiss me as some random individual, but as you engage with my content, you will come to realize that there is no other path than the one I am laying before you. No one else is telling you this, perhaps because it is difficult. This will not be easy. I am not pandering to hope, joy, or contentment. This will be the most uncomfortable process you will ever endure in your life. This is the truth and accepting it and using a system to navigate through it is the only way.
I am indifferent to criticism, for I have trained thousands of special operators and bomb technicians who have ventured into the worst parts of this planet and survived. Tragically, very few did not, but that is the nature of the job I advise, teach, and mentor. Now, I will provide you with some realistic tasks that you must undertake:
Step 1. Build a Team: Within your community, go to your neighbors, meet them, talk to them. You need people; you need a team, a platoon, a company, a battalion. You cannot do this alone.
Step 2. Utilize Guides: Refer to "We The People part 3, part 4, part 5, part 6, part 7 alpha 7 bravo, 7 Charlie" as a guide for tasks to work up and build towards. These contain detailed plans for elections, local involvement, and analyzing your government and Your communities, you must use it. The task that we are up against requires it. You will be overwhelmed if you don’t.
Step 3. Develop Leadership: Select leaders, and let leaders step up while everyone else follows rigorously. A good leader must first be a good follower. This is crucial. Learn about your community and government in ways you've never done before. It must be detailed, understanding every organization, service, and structure. You must learn the battle space before performing in it. There is no other way.
Step 4. Create a Battle Plan: Divide and conquer, secure your elections first. Liters break your manpower down evaluate talents and distribute those talents accordingly to the tasks that need to be performed. This is crucial, be accurate! Utilize the parts in the American elections mentioned in step 2 to secure your elections in detail. Stop passing blame and making excuses! Go do it! Learn everything about the process, the machines, the software, the testing, the companies involved. Learn every election official position what they do, how they do it and win from the state department all the way down to your local precinct. The parts mentioned in step two will guide you. You need to start electing individuals that are going to change this nation. This step is gravely important. Find people if you must. If you were asked to run for office, do it.
Step 5. Identify and Solve Problems: Refine them and create courses of action to solve them, utilizing the parts mentioned in step 2. Soon, I will be moving onto state government, showing you aspects, you may have never seen before.
Local action must propagate through both state and national levels, and there are specific ways to achieve this. But it all depends on elected positioning and influence. Until then, you can perform these steps, study, learn, live, and expand on parts five and six.
These will be your unique tactics on how you carry out actions to solve problems or utilize offensive political actions. You may resist this, but these are detailed, actionable, and precise solutions that I have been seeking from others but have not received. No one has stepped up I have. Those of you that know me know that I am not doing this for popularity or monetary gain. I fucking love this country and I’m not gonna lose it my grandchildren and their children and their children will thrive in the America that I thrived in. or I’m gonna die trying.
It does not matter what you feel or believe owns this country; this is the most crucial part, the most crucial piece of this whole recovery process,
and that is your mindset! No one fucking owns us. And I want you to say that to yourself as you read this, no one fucking owns us!!!
Secure your choke point and take it back. The battle is ours, and the time for action is now.
Written By SpartanAltsobaPatriot – 17th SOG
REFERENCES:
For Understanding Conspiracy Theories:
Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009). "Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures." Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(2), 202-227.
For U.S. Legal Structure and Constitutional Principles:
Chemerinsky, E. (2017). "Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies." Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
The U.S. Constitution itself, available from the National Archives: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution
For Executive Orders and Legal Framework:
The Federal Register's official website, where all executive orders are published: https://www.federalregister.gov/executive-orders
Black, H. C. (1990). "Black's Law Dictionary." West Publishing Co. (For legal definitions and understanding of corporate entities)
For Understanding the Psychology of Conspiracy Beliefs:
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). "The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories." Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538-542.
For Historical Context of the 1980s and 90s:
Patterson, J. T. (2005). "Restless Giant: The United States from Watergate to Bush v. Gore." Oxford University Press.
Books on Conspiracy Theories:
"The United States of Paranoia: A Conspiracy Theory" by Jesse Walker
"Suspicious Minds: Why We Believe Conspiracy Theories" by Rob Brotherton
 | A guest post by
|
Although there are several areas I arrive at different conclusions due to my teenage years in the ‘60s, 25+ years as a civilian in the AF (including 10+ years in contingency planning/response), my lifelong study of history, my intense study of organized crime, organized religion, very ancient history, anthropology, geology, geography as well as earlier positions in the local legal system, medical field, and as a believer in Christ, I consider that some elements are not complete; however, you have (in my opinion) clearly identified the exact actions that each citizen must endeavor to immediately pursue to restore our nation to the constitutional republic roots that our founding fathers labored to achieve against all odds. The other action our nation requires is to return our Creator to His rightful place in this (once) great nation as this battle is truly one between good and evil. God bless you for your dedication to researching all of this and your courageous willingness to share with all of your readers.🙏🇺🇸🙏
You should have added your S>O>J> initials .
The Vatican issued many more bulls than those youe mentioned, perhaps you should have started at 1054.
The Church appears to be the continuation of Empire and was confirmed as such within the European Parliament when they proudly proclaime they had rrecreated the Roman Empire without firing a shot.
The church did not fall apart through the reformation rather it concentrated those who wished to reform it under carefullly organised banners and gradually removed those free thinkers to Northern Europe alll the while debasing them from within via the Jesuits. The counter Reformation never went away , the Inquisition exists to this day defeated from within by the Jesuits who control the Vatican and the Vatican claims that all other churches are contracted to it by their accaptance of Constantine's "Sun" day whereby he declared himself greater then the Jewish God because he had stolen "God's Day"
The other institutions and power families of the past millennia have never gone awy despite occasional rises and falls of perticular alliances and families and still control the world till this day.
Your analysis of the structure of the usA from it's inception ti it'd becoming USA and beyond to the present day is mind bogglingly naive at best. I have persevered to the end of your summeries and am deeply disappointed,
We will never defeat an enemy we cannot face nor even name.