The U.S. legal system is complex and multifaceted, with different types of law (constitutional, statutory, contract, etc.) interacting in various ways. If you have specific questions about how these laws apply to a particular situation, it would be best to consult with a legal professional.
The U.S. legal system is complex and multifaceted, with different types of law (constitutional, statutory, contract, etc.) interacting in various ways. If you have specific questions about how these laws apply to a particular situation, it would be best to consult with a legal professional.
The British Accreditation Registry (BAR) is not a term found in U.S. law. The term "BAR" in the context of law typically refers to the Bar of a particular jurisdiction, such as the State Bar of California or the New York State Bar Association. These organizations are responsible for the regulation of lawyers within their jurisdiction, including admission to practice law and disciplinary actions. The term "BAR" originally referred to the physical barrier in a courtroom beyond which only participants in a trial may go, and by extension, the profession of being a lawyer.
The U.S. law does mention accreditation agencies in the context of education. For instance, Title 20 of the U.S. Code, Chapter 28, Subchapter IV, Section 1099b discusses the recognition of accrediting agencies or associations for institutions of higher education. It outlines the rules and regulations for such agencies, including their jurisdiction, the impact of loss of accreditation, regulations, and the length of recognition. However, these laws pertain to educational institutions and not to legal practice or the court system.
Your post also mentions the concept of "titles of nobility," which seems to be a reference to the so-called "Titles of Nobility Amendment" (TONA). This proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution was introduced in 1810 and would have stripped U.S. citizenship from any citizen who accepted a title of nobility from a foreign country. However, it was never ratified by enough states to become part of the Constitution.
The post you shared seems to be based on a number of misconceptions and conspiracy theories. For instance, the idea that the U.S. government or courts have been "stolen" by the British through the BAR is not supported by any credible evidence or legal theory. Similarly, the claim that people are turned into "trustees" through the issuance of a birth certificate or that constitutional rights have been converted into "civil rights" is not accurate.
In the U.S. legal system, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Any law or action by the government that conflicts with the Constitution can be challenged in court and struck down. This includes both federal and state laws, as well as actions by government officials. The courts, including the Supreme Court, are the final arbiters of what the Constitution means and whether a particular law or action is constitutional.
The idea of revoking consent to be governed and refusing to use Federal Reserve Notes (the U.S. dollar) is not a practical or legal solution to perceived problems with the government. The U.S. government is established by the Constitution and derives its power from the consent of the governed, as expressed through the our Constitutional Federal Republic process. While people are free to express their dissatisfaction with the government and to advocate for changes, they cannot simply opt out of being subject to its laws. Similarly, the U.S. dollar is legal tender for all debts, public and private, and refusing to use it would not exempt a person from their legal obligations.
The claim that the U.S. government or courts have been "stolen" by the British through the BAR is not supported by any credible evidence or legal theory that I have found. The BAR, or Bar Association, is a professional body of lawyers. The term "BAR" is often said to stand for "British Accreditation Regency" or "British Accreditation Registry", suggesting a link to British control, but this is a myth.
The term "bar" in this context actually comes from the physical barrier in a courtroom that separates the lawyers and judges from the rest of the court. Passing the "bar" refers to being admitted to court to practice law.
The belief that the British control the U.S. courts likely stems from what I believe a misunderstanding of the origins and influences on the U.S. legal system. The U.S. legal system is indeed influenced by English common law, which was the legal system in place in England at the time of the American Revolution. This influence is seen in many aspects of U.S. law, from the concept of precedent (where past court decisions influence future ones) to certain legal terms and principles.
The U.S. legal system is based on its own Constitution and laws, not controlled by any foreign entity. The U.S. Constitution, adopted in 1787, is the supreme law of the land. All laws and government actions must conform to it. The Constitution establishes the structure of the federal government, delineates its powers, and guarantees individual rights.
The U.S. legal system is also influenced by the common law tradition, which is based on court decisions rather than laws enacted by legislatures. This is a system that originated in England but has been fully incorporated into the U.S. legal system.
The U.S. legal system is complex and multi-layered, with federal laws, state laws, and judicial decisions all playing a role. Federal laws are created by Congress and apply to the entire nation. State laws are created by state legislatures and apply within each individual state. Judicial decisions from federal and state courts interpret these laws and can establish legal precedents.
The U.S. legal system also includes administrative law, which is law created by administrative agencies. This can include rules, regulations, orders, and decisions created by federal, state, or local government agencies.
In terms of the precedence of laws, the U.S. Constitution is the highest law of the land. Federal laws made in accordance with the Constitution are the next highest, followed by state constitutions, state laws, and then local laws. If a law at any level conflicts with a higher law, the higher law takes precedence.
However, this influence does not equate to control. After the American Revolution, the newly formed United States established its own Constitution and legal system. While it drew upon English common law for many of its principles, it also incorporated unique elements, such as a written Constitution and a system of federalism that divides power between the federal and state governments.
While the U.S. legal system has been influenced by English common law, it is an independent system governed by the U.S. Constitution and federal and state laws. The belief that the British control the U.S. courts is a misunderstanding of these historical and legal complexities.
The legal system of the United States has a rich and complex history that has evolved over centuries. It is a system that is deeply rooted in principles of justice, fairness, and the rule of law.
The legal system of the United States has its roots in English common law, which was brought to the New World by early settlers. Common law, also known as case law or precedent, is a body of law based on judicial decisions rather than statutes passed by legislatures. It originated in medieval England and was applied within British colonies across continents. The essence of common law is that it is made by judges sitting in courts, applying their common sense and knowledge of legal precedent (stare decisis) to the facts before them. Over time, these legal decisions, or case law, build up a body of law.
The United States Code, which is the codification of the general and permanent laws of the United States, was first published in 1926 by the House of Representatives.
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which is the foundation of military law in the United States, was established by the United States Congress on May 5, 1950, and it became effective on May 31, 1951.
Before the United States Code was established in 1926, federal laws in the United States were organized into the Revised Statutes of the United States, enacted in 1874, and the Statutes at Large.
The Statutes at Large is a comprehensive collection of the laws of the United States from 1789 to the present, arranged chronologically. It includes all the laws passed by the U.S. Congress, in the order in which they were enacted.
The Revised Statutes of the United States was the first official codification of the Acts of Congress. It compiled all the permanent laws in force as of December 1, 1873. However, it was superseded by the United States Code in 1926.
It's important to note that the U.S. also operates under a system of common law, which means that many laws and legal principles are derived from court decisions. This system was inherited from the English legal tradition.
2.
The U.S. legal system is complex and multifaceted, with different types of law (constitutional, statutory, contract, etc.) interacting in various ways. If you have specific questions about how these laws apply to a particular situation, it would be best to consult with a legal professional.
The British Accreditation Registry (BAR) is not a term found in U.S. law. The term "BAR" in the context of law typically refers to the Bar of a particular jurisdiction, such as the State Bar of California or the New York State Bar Association. These organizations are responsible for the regulation of lawyers within their jurisdiction, including admission to practice law and disciplinary actions. The term "BAR" originally referred to the physical barrier in a courtroom beyond which only participants in a trial may go, and by extension, the profession of being a lawyer.
The U.S. law does mention accreditation agencies in the context of education. For instance, Title 20 of the U.S. Code, Chapter 28, Subchapter IV, Section 1099b discusses the recognition of accrediting agencies or associations for institutions of higher education. It outlines the rules and regulations for such agencies, including their jurisdiction, the impact of loss of accreditation, regulations, and the length of recognition. However, these laws pertain to educational institutions and not to legal practice or the court system.
Your post also mentions the concept of "titles of nobility," which seems to be a reference to the so-called "Titles of Nobility Amendment" (TONA). This proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution was introduced in 1810 and would have stripped U.S. citizenship from any citizen who accepted a title of nobility from a foreign country. However, it was never ratified by enough states to become part of the Constitution.
The post you shared seems to be based on a number of misconceptions and conspiracy theories. For instance, the idea that the U.S. government or courts have been "stolen" by the British through the BAR is not supported by any credible evidence or legal theory. Similarly, the claim that people are turned into "trustees" through the issuance of a birth certificate or that constitutional rights have been converted into "civil rights" is not accurate.
In the U.S. legal system, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Any law or action by the government that conflicts with the Constitution can be challenged in court and struck down. This includes both federal and state laws, as well as actions by government officials. The courts, including the Supreme Court, are the final arbiters of what the Constitution means and whether a particular law or action is constitutional.
The idea of revoking consent to be governed and refusing to use Federal Reserve Notes (the U.S. dollar) is not a practical or legal solution to perceived problems with the government. The U.S. government is established by the Constitution and derives its power from the consent of the governed, as expressed through the our Constitutional Federal Republic process. While people are free to express their dissatisfaction with the government and to advocate for changes, they cannot simply opt out of being subject to its laws. Similarly, the U.S. dollar is legal tender for all debts, public and private, and refusing to use it would not exempt a person from their legal obligations.
The claim that the U.S. government or courts have been "stolen" by the British through the BAR is not supported by any credible evidence or legal theory that I have found. The BAR, or Bar Association, is a professional body of lawyers. The term "BAR" is often said to stand for "British Accreditation Regency" or "British Accreditation Registry", suggesting a link to British control, but this is a myth.
The term "bar" in this context actually comes from the physical barrier in a courtroom that separates the lawyers and judges from the rest of the court. Passing the "bar" refers to being admitted to court to practice law.
The belief that the British control the U.S. courts likely stems from what I believe a misunderstanding of the origins and influences on the U.S. legal system. The U.S. legal system is indeed influenced by English common law, which was the legal system in place in England at the time of the American Revolution. This influence is seen in many aspects of U.S. law, from the concept of precedent (where past court decisions influence future ones) to certain legal terms and principles.
The U.S. legal system is based on its own Constitution and laws, not controlled by any foreign entity. The U.S. Constitution, adopted in 1787, is the supreme law of the land. All laws and government actions must conform to it. The Constitution establishes the structure of the federal government, delineates its powers, and guarantees individual rights.
The U.S. legal system is also influenced by the common law tradition, which is based on court decisions rather than laws enacted by legislatures. This is a system that originated in England but has been fully incorporated into the U.S. legal system.
The U.S. legal system is complex and multi-layered, with federal laws, state laws, and judicial decisions all playing a role. Federal laws are created by Congress and apply to the entire nation. State laws are created by state legislatures and apply within each individual state. Judicial decisions from federal and state courts interpret these laws and can establish legal precedents.
The U.S. legal system also includes administrative law, which is law created by administrative agencies. This can include rules, regulations, orders, and decisions created by federal, state, or local government agencies.
In terms of the precedence of laws, the U.S. Constitution is the highest law of the land. Federal laws made in accordance with the Constitution are the next highest, followed by state constitutions, state laws, and then local laws. If a law at any level conflicts with a higher law, the higher law takes precedence.
However, this influence does not equate to control. After the American Revolution, the newly formed United States established its own Constitution and legal system. While it drew upon English common law for many of its principles, it also incorporated unique elements, such as a written Constitution and a system of federalism that divides power between the federal and state governments.
While the U.S. legal system has been influenced by English common law, it is an independent system governed by the U.S. Constitution and federal and state laws. The belief that the British control the U.S. courts is a misunderstanding of these historical and legal complexities.
The legal system of the United States has a rich and complex history that has evolved over centuries. It is a system that is deeply rooted in principles of justice, fairness, and the rule of law.
The legal system of the United States has its roots in English common law, which was brought to the New World by early settlers. Common law, also known as case law or precedent, is a body of law based on judicial decisions rather than statutes passed by legislatures. It originated in medieval England and was applied within British colonies across continents. The essence of common law is that it is made by judges sitting in courts, applying their common sense and knowledge of legal precedent (stare decisis) to the facts before them. Over time, these legal decisions, or case law, build up a body of law.
The United States Code, which is the codification of the general and permanent laws of the United States, was first published in 1926 by the House of Representatives.
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which is the foundation of military law in the United States, was established by the United States Congress on May 5, 1950, and it became effective on May 31, 1951.
Before the United States Code was established in 1926, federal laws in the United States were organized into the Revised Statutes of the United States, enacted in 1874, and the Statutes at Large.
The Statutes at Large is a comprehensive collection of the laws of the United States from 1789 to the present, arranged chronologically. It includes all the laws passed by the U.S. Congress, in the order in which they were enacted.
The Revised Statutes of the United States was the first official codification of the Acts of Congress. It compiled all the permanent laws in force as of December 1, 1873. However, it was superseded by the United States Code in 1926.
It's important to note that the U.S. also operates under a system of common law, which means that many laws and legal principles are derived from court decisions. This system was inherited from the English legal tradition.