6 Comments

It's ironic that people who disagree with the Warren Commission's conclusion that President Kennedy was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald (gasp . . . is it okay to call them Conspiracy Theorists?) like to call "Oswald-Did-It" Lone Gunman Advocates like me "Lone Nutters."

Do you condone their doing that?

Regardless, you seem to take offense at being thought of as a "Conspiracy Theorist."

I'm sobbing uncontrollably.

Question: When it comes to the JFK assassination, would you prefer being referred to as a "conspiracy buff," or . . . gasp . . . "a tinfoil-hat conspiracy theorist"?

Expand full comment

Although the anomaly-replete JFK assassination is the Mother of All Conspiracy Theories, the fact remains that a sharpshooting, psychologically disturbed, self-described Marxist former Marine U-2 radar operator by the name of Lee Harvey Oswald, with or without encouragement or logistical support from the KGB*, killed JFK by firing three shots at him over 10.32 seconds in the echo chamber known as Dealey Plaza.

The three spent shells found on the Sniper's Nest floor reflect his two firing positions -- standing and leaning forward versus kneeling and resting his left elbow on the top box at the window -- and help to explain why he missed everything with his steeply-downward-angled first shot.

Those who believe the JFK assassination was a CIA, FBI, Secret Service, or [fill in the blank] conspiracy can be separated into two categories:

1) Pinko "National Security State"-hating Conspiracy Theorists

2) Neo-Fascist "Deep State"-hating Conspiracy Theorists.

Note: The term "Deep State" used to be used by those on the Left and Far-Left to mean something like a secret government, but over the past eight years or so has been appropriated by Trump-supporting Neo-Fascists who have corrupted its original meaning to its present one: "The Administrative State."

You may be interested to know that, according to former high-level Army Intelligence analyst and NSA officer John M. Newman in his 2022 book "Uncovering Popo's Mole," a KGB* "mole" by the name of Bruce Leonard Solie (look up my Wikipedia draft article on him) in CIA's mole-hunting Office of Security sent (or duped his confidant, protégé and mole-hunting subordinate, James Angleton, into sending) Oswald to Moscow in 1959 as an ostensible "dangle" in a-planned-by-Solie-to-fail hunt for "Popov's Mole" (Solie) in the wrong part of the CIA -- the Soviet Russia Division. This planned-to-fail mole hunt lasted nine years, protected Solie from being uncovered, ruined Angleton, and tore the Soviet Russia Division apart.

*Today's SVR and FSB

Expand full comment

So the U.S. Corporation Act of 1871 wasn’t a real thing?

So you’re saying that they haven’t been manipulating elections and installing the leaders they want installed for decades if not centuries?

So when Donald Trump stated under oath that he wasn’t President on January 6th, 2021 — he was lying and the military wasn’t in control?

You are a terrific writer, seriously — I love your work but you are leading people astray. Just like with Flynn. Still haven’t answered those questions from that post either.

Expand full comment

Yes, I'm saying the U.S. Corporation Act of 1871 is not a real thing.

The Organic Act of 1871 was simply creating a local government in our nation's capital.

And no, I'm not saying that they haven't manipulated elections. Of course they have. I never said that. Please don't put words in my mouth.

What do you mean President Trump stated under oath that he wasn't the president on January 6th, 2021? He never said the military was in control.

What I'm saying, and what this six-part series details, is that these are narratives seeded by the enemy to separate you from our nation, our national pride, and lying to you. It is these theories that's leading people astray, not me. I'm bringing the truth. If you can't handle it or you're not willing to see the truth and you're willing to get suckered by the very entity that I described in detail with six parts, I don't know what to tell you.

But don't come in here and tell me I'm manipulating. I'm not. Have you actually read the act, the organic act of 1871? Have you actually read it? Because there's oaths to the constitution in there. It specifically states that it is subordinate to the constitution and says nothing, nothing whatsoever about being a US corporation. A municipal corporation is not what you think it is. Its history goes back to bodies of people, not a business sense like everyone is taking it. Go to the Black law Dictionary and look up what a municipal corporation is.

Expand full comment

No mentions of aipac...

Expand full comment

Start a substack, write about it. You missed the whole point, as you just demonstrated.

Expand full comment