Facing the Psyop

A Plea for Civic Activism and Constitutional Integrity

The Psyop

I understand that this may stir discontent among many, and I recognize the possibility that friendships may strain as a result. However, silence is no longer an option for me; my conscience compels me to speak out. My hope is that more individuals will find the courage to do the same.

Various theories are making rounds, suggesting actions and decisions undertaken by former President Trump prior to his supposed departure from office. Among these, some even assert that he has not officially ceded his role, claiming that he remains the incumbent President or Commander-in-Chief.

It is challenging for me to witness the individuals who propagate these theories, some of whom I previously held in high regard. These individuals, all supporters of Trump, confound me with their acceptance of concepts that challenge the very foundations of our constitutional and legal systems.

The situation seems to veer into an almost surreal territory where the Constitution is viewed as temporarily suspended or irrelevant. This is an alarming perspective that undermines the very essence of our constitutional republic and rule of law. Should we accept that the Constitution is suspended, we also accept the voiding of our legal and military laws, regulations, statutes, codes, and ordinances – all of which derive directly from the Constitution.

Such a scenario is catastrophic: without the Constitution, there is no accountability. The prospect that some people accept this possibility genuinely baffles me. The Constitution safeguards our rights, our way of life, our religious beliefs; all is at stake without it. If these theory’s were to occur under Trump, who is to say a more tyrannical leader, would not attempt the same? These theories implicate Trump as a tyrant and dictator. I wonder if the way Trump will be viewed as as being a tyrant and a dictator even cross their minds?

The implications are deeply troubling. Without the rule of law, any leader can construct narratives about groups of individuals, branding them as 'other', potentially fostering division and discord or worse. This concern has led to my confusion over the direction of the MAGA movement. I want to assure everyone that not all its members subscribe to these theories. However, we risk alienating a large portion of our base if we fail to address this issue.

It is essential to remember the entities against which Trump has positioned himself – corruption, the 'swamp', deep state, the global elite, and others. To fight these effectively, we require the rule of law. Each of us would expect the law to defend us were we unjustly accused, and we must maintain that standard for all.

It is deeply puzzling to me why some support ideologies that promote bypassing the Constitution. The belief that the level of corruption justifies suspending the Constitution for redress is not just absurd, but dangerous. Instead, I urge everyone to scrutinize these theories through the lens of the Constitution and rule of law, for without them, we risk plunging our society into chaos.

A failure to find a constitutionally legal pathway to address these issues does not mean one does not exist. I am witnessing intelligent individuals endorse and follow misguided theories. It is with regret that I raise this issue, but I implore you to reassess your stance. As it stands, I fear we are falling behind.

The theories circulating within our community seem to precipitate several concerning outcomes:

1. Diminished civic participation.

2. A lack of urgency about the present situation.

3. A systematic undermining of our Constitution and founding principles.

4. An erosion of national pride in the rule of law.

To those who adhere to these theories, you might assure yourselves by planning to vote. However, let me make it clear: voting, while crucial, is merely the start. Our current circumstances demand more than just casting ballots. We need civic involvement leading up to, during, and after the voting process is completed. We need creative solutions, proactive involvement, relentless determination, and unyielding patriotism. Our sense of national pride is under threat from these ideologies.

Some may argue that I'm exaggerating, but from my perspective, the opposite is true. I fear that many are underestimating the effects of these theories. I foresee a potential loss in 2024, which I believe to be a deliberate outcome. It appears to me as one of the most successful psychological operations unfolding before our very eyes, the purpose of which is to induce a state of cynicism, apathy, or some other form of "trust the plan" inaction.

For those who believe that our Constitution is so damaged that it requires a reset, I contend that this perspective is not only uninformed but also perilous and reckless. We must endeavor to set an example by employing our current Constitution to enforce accountability. If you believe this is unachievable, I worry that your judgment may have been clouded by the psychological manipulation at play.

Our Constitution is not simply a relic of a bygone era; it is a dynamic blueprint that shapes our national identity. It serves as our ethical guidepost and a symbol of our collective values. Moreover, it is our most potent weapon in preserving our republic and ensuring justice in our society. As custodians of this living document, it is our duty to protect and uphold it, to safeguard the stability and harmony of the future we bequeath to coming generations.

Elections

As we transition into the matter of election integrity, one of the primary drivers behind the previously mentioned theories is the accusation of election theft. Some proponents argue that there may have been instances of electoral misconduct, and it is indeed crucial for us to investigate these claims rigorously. A worrying number of people seem to accept or even advocate for the suspension of the Constitution to enable military governance. Yet, should we unquestioningly accept that every judge involved in these court cases was complicit in corruption? It seems more reasonable to entertain the probability that a small subset of judges may have fallen prey to corruption (scenario one), or to consider the potential lack of appropriate expertise among those that collected evidence with no evidence collection expertise (scenario two). These possibilities invite legitimate concerns about the credibility of the evidence provided. Furthermore, it is vital to contemplate which scenario is more manageable and straightforward to address. Allow me to delve deeper into these considerations.

Let us not forget the fundamental principles upon which our court systems are built. The presumption of innocence until proven guilty carries immense weight in our society. This principle should not be taken lightly, for it is the cornerstone of justice. Now, turning our attention to the investigations, we must question the widespread notion that every state involved was tainted by corruption. Such an assertion requires substantial evidence. Were any of us physically present during these investigations? These doubts underscore the urgent need for our active involvement in the upcoming elections.

If you find yourself infuriated by the current state of affairs, it is imperative that you channel that frustration into action. Merely expressing discontent without participating in the democratic process is an exercise in futility. Do you truly wish to relinquish the very foundation of our constitution in order to combat corruption? I implore you to think deeply about the consequences of such a drastic decision. Our collective voice matters, and it can only be heard if we actively engage in the electoral process. Trust in ourselves and let us seize the opportunity to shape our future.

Now, let me be clear, I'm not dismissing the possibility of irregularities or cheating. What I'm emphasizing is our absence during those crucial moments. We must be present to witness and understand the process. I know this might not sit well with some people and it might anger many. Frankly, I couldn't care less. Lately, it seems I've been consistently challenging the status quo. Why? Because I've been urging people to actively engage with their local government. Why would that upset anyone? Or for advocating the importance of upholding our cherished constitution, why would that make anyone mad? I fail to comprehend it.

The only conclusion I can draw is that some of you have been so thoroughly indoctrinated to believe that our beloved constitution is beyond repair. Are you suggesting we should burn it all down? Have you lost your sanity? I am seething with anger, desperately searching for another soul who shares my level of fury.

Another concern that deeply troubles me, in addition to this indoctrinated mindset, is the tendency of some to opt for the path of least resistance. It seems easier for them to make sweeping claims, declaring everything and everyone as corrupt, and simply rely on the military to come in and fix everything. But when has the easy way ever been the right way?

We must not succumb to the allure of shortcuts and quick fixes. History has shown us that such approaches often lead to disastrous outcomes. Genuine change, lasting progress, and the preservation of our constitutional principles require diligent effort, not hasty solutions. It is through active engagement, critical thinking, and a steadfast commitment to the principles enshrined in our constitution that we can overcome challenges and pave the way for a brighter future. Let us not be swayed by the seduction of simplicity, but rather embrace the noble struggle that lies ahead.

Now, let those who are inclined towards weak-mindedness and taking the easy way come forth and attack my ideas. I shall patiently await your arrival. Show yourselves, individuals who prefer the path of least resistance.

Written by SpartanAltsobaPatriot

-17th SOG