Power, Deception, and Control, Part 1

Critiquing the Global Elite's Influence on Sovereignty and Rights

Confronting Misinformation: A Personal Stand

Numerous theories have emerged recently, spanning from longstanding to quite recent. They share certain characteristics, notably being predicated on falsehoods, selective information, and in some cases, outright fabrications. My outspoken criticism of these theories, which I perceive as violating the principles of our constitutional republic and fundamentally un-American, has not endeared me to many. For the past year, my stance has been met with significant opposition, yet this has not deterred me from voicing my convictions. I remain unmoved by these theories, driven solely by factual accuracy and truth.

Many theories, often labeled as conspiracy theories, have emerged over the years concerning the banking system, influential families, and their alleged control over global affairs for centuries. While some of these theories may hold elements of truth, particularly those related to the influence of powerful entities, other aspects of these narratives are less credible, particularly those that undermine the sovereignty and constitutional integrity of the United States.

For instance, theories such as the United States being a corporation, or those related to the Organic Act and the Act of 1871 concerning Washington D.C., suggest a loss of national sovereignty. However, upon closer examination, there appears to be no substantial evidence supporting the idea of direct ownership or control of the United States by external entities. Our national sovereignty remains intact, and claims to the contrary are unfounded.

While external influences do exist, they have not eroded the core freedoms and rights that the United States stands for. The principles of freedom, critical thinking, free speech, and the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment are central to American identity and are often the subject of vigorous debate and protection. Any narrative suggesting a diminution of these rights warrants skepticism and critical analysis.

Suspicion arises when certain theories discourage active participation in local government or promote the idea that external salvation, whether through military intervention or other means, is imminent. Such notions can divert attention from the challenges we face, and the work needed to address them. The idea of the U.S. Constitution being suspended, or the nation being owned by external entities like the Vatican or England are baseless and distract from the actual task of civic engagement and governance.

As citizens, it is our responsibility to understand and exercise our power. The United States remains a sovereign nation, governed by and for its people. It is through this understanding and active participation in our republican processes that we can truly reinforce and exude our strength as a nation. Our focus should be on safeguarding our rights and freedoms, ensuring transparent governance, and continuously striving to uphold the values enshrined in our Constitution.

A Soldier's Commitment to Constitutional Integrity

My dedication to my country is unwavering. Having served in three combat tours, losing thirteen comrades, my commitment to upholding the Constitution is profound. It infuriates me to witness any actions that undermine it, as I passionately believe in its crucial role in safeguarding our rights and freedoms. The notion that our Constitution is being disregarded or deemed irrelevant is a grave concern. The issue lies not in the Constitution's irrelevance, but in our failure to actively uphold and utilize it as a guiding principle

In my efforts to address these misconceptions, I have specifically refuted theories like Patel Patriots' Devolution, Derrick Johnson's Law of War Manual, and claims about the United States being a corporation, among others. This has led to significant backlash, but I remain undeterred and take pride in challenging narratives that dominate even within segments of the Make America Great Again community. The derision and attempts to discredit my efforts have only strengthened my resolve to speak louder in defense of the truth. If you think that it's patriotic to support theories that say the Constitution is suspended, in my view, it's the absolute opposite of being patriotic.

The Paradox: Advocating Theories While Undermining the Constitution

In my article, "Elements of American Power," I aimed to provide an accurate analysis, with one notable exception that we will examine. This piece also addresses how such theories distract us from identifying and confronting our true adversaries. I am perplexed by those who, while acknowledging the importance of these theories, simultaneously advocate for disregarding the Constitution. It begs the question: Why undermine the very document that stands as our defense against these adversaries, if properly adhered to and applied? 

The question of who controls the world often leads us down various speculative paths. However, a more nuanced and perhaps more relevant question is how the world is controlled. Consider the proposition that the United States, and indeed many nations, are not so much corporate entities themselves but are significantly influenced or even dominated by corporate interests. This phenomenon is not unique to America but is a global issue, where corporate influence extends beyond national borders, affecting almost every country on Earth.

This influence is exerted in subtle and complex ways, often under the guise of laws and legislation that are ostensibly enacted for the public good. Yet, upon closer examination, it becomes evident that these laws often serve the interests of a select few – individuals and shareholders whose power and wealth grant them disproportionate influence over public policy. This pattern is not a recent development but has historical roots that stretch back centuries.

While delving into historical examples could provide context, it is more pertinent to focus on the current state of affairs. The present reality is what impacts us now and what will shape our future. In this contemporary context, the idea of national sovereignty and the preservation of cultural uniqueness becomes even more vital. Each nation, with its distinct culture and values, contributes to the global tapestry. However, the encroachment of corporate interests often threatens these unique national identities and values.

The Subtle Erosion of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms

In the context of the United States, cherished principles such as freedom, liberty, independence, freedom of thought, free speech, and Second Amendment rights are pivotal. While these rights are currently intact, they face challenges and pressures in today's political and social climate. Observing the experiences of other nations, such as Australia, where certain rights and freedoms (like those enshrined in the U.S. Bill of Rights) are either absent or under significant threat, can provide a sobering perspective. The erosion of free speech and other fundamental rights in various countries is a warning of what could happen if vigilance is not maintained.

Therefore, identifying a common enemy in this global landscape becomes a complex task. Is it the overarching influence of corporate entities that transcend national boundaries? Or is it a more intangible adversary, such as the gradual erosion of fundamental rights and freedoms under various pretexts? Perhaps the true challenge lies in balancing the preservation of national sovereignty and cultural identity with the need to unite globally under common values such as truth, justice, and freedom. Recognizing these shared values, while respecting each nation's uniqueness, could be key to confronting these global challenges effectively.

Identifying our adversary in the contemporary global landscape is a complex and multifaceted endeavor. Often, our initial thoughts might turn to nation-states like Russia, China, or Iran, perceived traditionally as geopolitical rivals or threats. However, the true nature of global influence often transcends national borders, involving a more intricate web of power and control.

The Vast Network of Global Elite Influence

Consider the concept of the 'world elite,' a term that evokes images of venerable institutions like the Vatican or the Crown. But what if the reality is far more expansive and sophisticated, encompassing a broader spectrum of entities? These entities, rather than being limited to a few recognizable names, actually span a vast network that has strategically encompassed and secured key systems, policies, and initiatives. Their influence is designed to exert control and maintain power over every aspect of global dynamics. This elite network operates through five fundamental categories that have a far-reaching impact on every nation:

Legislative and Regulatory Bodies: These include organizations like the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the European Central Bank, and other similar entities worldwide. Here are some Legislative and Regulatory Bodies:

1.   U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

2.   Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) - UK

3.   Federal Reserve System (Fed) - USA

4.   European Central Bank (ECB)

5.   China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC)

6.   Reserve Bank of India (RBI)

7.   Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)

8.   Banque de France - France

9.   Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin) - Germany

10.  Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) - Canada

11.  Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV) - Spain

12.  Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) - USA

13.  Conseil de Stabilité Financière (CSF) - France

14.  Financial Services Agency (FSA) - Japan

15.  Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)

16.  National Bank of Belgium (NBB)

17.  Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) - Canada

18.  Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) - UK

19.  Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) - Switzerland

20. The People's Bank of China (PBoC)

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): The integration of ESG concerns into global economic systems and legislative processes represents a significant shift in how corporate and economic activities are evaluated and regulated. The following are some ESG organizations:

1. Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI)

2. Ceres

3. European Sustainable Investment Forum (Eurosif)

4. Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment (US SIF)

5. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)

6. International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC)

7. Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS)

8. Green Bond Principles (GBP)

9. Climate Bonds Initiative (CBI)

10. International Platform on Sustainable Finance (IPSF)

11. United Nations Global Compact (UNGC)

12. Value Reporting Foundation (VRF) - formed from the merger of SASB and IIRC

13. Carbon Disclosure Project

14. Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB)

15. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)

16. Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN)

17. Task Force on Climate–related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)

18. Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC)

19. International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN)

20. Global Sustainable Investment Alliance (GSIA)

Financial Alliances and Initiatives: Major financial institutions and groups, such as the World Bank or the International Monetary Fund (IMF), are key players in this category. These alliances are also receptive to insights and policy recommendations from think tanks, which further shapes their strategies and decisions. The following are some financial regulatory institutions:

1. International Monetary Fund (IMF)

2. World Bank

3. Asian Development Bank (ADB)

4. African Development Bank (AfDB).

5. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD)

6. Inter-American Development Bank (IDB)

7. Green Climate Fund (GCF)

8. Adaptation Fund

9. Climate Investment Funds (CIFs)

10. Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ).

11. International Finance Corporation (IFC).

12. New Development Bank (NDB)

13. International Development Association (IDA)

14. European Investment Bank (EIB)

15. Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB)

16. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)

17. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC)

18. Development Bank of Latin America (CAF).

19. Nordic Investment Bank (NIB)

20. Global Environment Facility (GEF)

Think Tanks and Policy Groups: These organizations are the intellectual epicenters of policymaking, offering research, analysis, and recommendations on a multitude of issues. Their work is influenced by their personal experiences, biases, and ethical considerations.

1. Brookings Institution (United States)

2. Chatham House (United Kingdom)

3. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (United States)

4. RAND Corporation (United States)

5. Council on Foreign Relations (United States)

6. Bruegel (Belgium)

7. Center for Strategic and International Studies (United States)

8. Heritage Foundation (United States)

9. International Institute for Strategic Studies (United Kingdom)

10. Cato Institute (United States)

11. Center for European Policy Studies (Belgium)

12. Australian Strategic Policy Institute (Australia)

13. German Institute for International and Security Affairs (Germany)

14. Observer Research Foundation (India)

15. French Institute of International Relations (France)

16. European Council on Foreign Relations (European Union)

17. Institute for National Security Studies (Israel)

18. Royal United Services Institute (United Kingdom)

19. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Sweden)

20. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars (United States)

Global Economic Systems: This category encompasses a wide array of international economic institutions, trade organizations, and economic forums. The decisions made in these forums affect the economic prospects of nations and the global economy as a whole, highlighting their crucial role in the network of global influence. 

1. United Nations (UN)

2. World Trade Organization (WTO).

3. International Monetary Fund (IMF)

4. World Bank (WB).

5. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)

6. International Development Association (IDA)

7. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

8. International Organization for Migration (IOM)

9. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTD)

10. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)

11. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)

12. European Central Bank (ECB)

13. G20

14. Bank for International Settlements (BIS)

15. Group of Seven (G7)

16. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC).

17. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)

18. African Union (AU)

19. European Union (EU)

20. International Labour Organization (ILO)

The interconnectedness of these entities and their influence is indeed profound, and understanding this complexity is crucial for citizens worldwide, including those in the United States. Recognizing the extent of this influence is the first step in addressing it.

Human history is replete with examples of societies rising against various forms of oppression and control. From revolutions that have toppled monarchies to movements that have dismantled colonial empires, the struggle for freedom and rights is a recurring theme. The current situation, where global elites wield major influence, is another chapter in this ongoing narrative.

Part 2

Part 3

Written by SpartanAltsobaPatriot

References:

1. Government Officials and Policymakers: These individuals often have the power to enact laws and regulations that can directly affect the operations and policies of these organizations.

2. These funders can have a significant influence on the organization’s priorities and activities.

3. Board Members and Executives: The individuals who hold leadership positions within these organizations often have a significant influence over their strategic direction and operations.

4. This is particularly true for trade organizations and economic forums.

5. These individuals can influence these organizations through their research findings.

6. Media coverage can also influence these organizations by shaping public perception and drawing attention to certain issues.

7. International Bodies: International bodies like the United Nations can influence these organizations through their global policies and initiatives.

8. Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs): NGOs often work closely with these organizations and can influence their policies and activities.

9. Please note that the level of influence that these entities or individuals have can vary greatly depending on the specific organization and context

10. 5 Think Tanks That Have Successfully Impacted Public Policy - The Kolabtree Blog

11. Abelson, D. E. (2006).
    Title: A Capitol Idea: Think Tanks & US Foreign Policy
    Publisher: McGill-Queen's University Press
    Reference ID: Abelson2006

12. Abelson, D. E. (2018).
    Title: Do Think Tanks Matter? Assessing the Impact of Public Policy Institutes
    Publisher: McGill-Queen's University Press
    Reference ID: Abelson2018

13. Abelson, D.E. & C.J. Rastrick (Eds.) (2021).
    Title: Handbook on Think Tanks in Public Policy
    Reference ID: ref3

14. Braml, J. (2017).
    Chapter: Germany: The Think and the Tank
    In: Think Tanks, Foreign Policy and Geo-Politics: Pathways to Influence
    Edited by: Abelson, D. E., Brooks, S., & Hua, X.
    Publisher: Routledge
    Reference ID: Braml2017

15. Drezner, D. W. (2017).
    Title: The Ideas Industry: How Pessimists, Partisans, and Plutocrats are Transforming the Marketplace of Ideas
    Publisher: Oxford University Press
    Reference ID: Drezner2017

16. McGann, J. G. (2021).
    Title: 2020 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report. Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program
    Publisher: University of Pennsylvania
    Reference ID: McGann2021

17. Medvetz, T. (2012).
    Title: Think Tanks in America
    Publisher: University of Chicago Press
    URL: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226517308.001.0001
    DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226517308.001.0001
    Reference ID: Medvetz2012

18. Menegazzi, S. (2018).
    Title: Rethinking Think Tanks in Contemporary China
    Publisher: Springer
    URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57300-7
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57300-7
    Reference ID: Menegazzi2018

19. Pautz, H. (2012).
    Title: Think Tanks, Social Democracy, and Social Policy
    Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
    URL: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230368545
    DOI: 10.1057/9780230368545
    Reference ID: Pautz2012