Derek Johnson is not part of Badlands Media. It’s not aimed at fracturing Trump’s base. They are very pro Trump and Pro MAGA. I see it as MAGA for intellectuals. It’s got a lot of Q in it too. I don’t see it as a bad thing for MAGA or for Trump. They fully admit they are working at Narrative warfare and that actual events may not be the same as stories told on either side They are focused not on breaking MAGA, but rather on breaking globalist/communist/ uniparty/unipolar narratives that are focused on bringing about the Great Reset. Instead , the counter narrative is about the Great Awakening and a new golden age for America and the world based not on unipolar control, but instead a sovereign alliance of nations forming a multipolar world based on sovereignty and freedom. It’s a much brighter future than anything the WEF has cooked up for us.
I'm fully aware that Derek Johnson is not part of Badlands Media and in my opinion it is aimed at fracturing Trump's base. What do you think is going to happen when all this comes to light? When people realize that Trump wasn't the commander-in-chief. That Trump didn't devolve the government. There's only one solution and it's not the military, it's we the people. That's the Great Awakening. The Great Awakening does not involve military tribunals. That's a lie. It doesn't involve some secret military occupancy. That's a lie. It doesn't include Trump devolving the government and somehow he's still secretly in charge. That is a lie. But hey, who am I?
I’ve been following the Badlands News Brief for months, because they usually bring up the interesting news, but I have found their takes sometimes to be a little out there. Take the Sovereign Alliance for example. This is a group of nations that could give two hoots about human rights, forming an alliance of decentralized, multi-lateral alliances? Please. They may join forces to bring down the US, but they’ll be fighting each other over our dead bodies. Not to mention with all the saber rattling against the WEF, they’re still in bed with them (namely China). It never made sense to me. Their (Badlands) takes are very clever, hiding incongruous facts with conjecture. Thank you for confirming my doubts. I was starting to question my spidey sense. MoveOn being the source makes perfect sense- with all the anti-Israel takes. Israel is the blind spot.
It’s ok if it’s not your cup of tea. No one is forcing you to watch it. But personally I would much rather watch people who encourage me to think for myself and to know that that everyone has an axe to grind and wants to program you. If someone makes a claim they should be able to back it up. This article here gives evidence they have a good business model, have shows that keep people engaged, good shows. And that they are getting their message out. Then they make a claim that Badlands is trying to fracture MAGA. There is no evidence presented for that claim. It’s no better than the “Orange man Bad” claim we have been pummeled with. This article is asking me to believe a claim with no evidence. They want to program me, not educate me.
I don’t think we have any way of knowing what Trump did or didn’t do. We can look at the evidence but in the end we can’t know for sure. I do believe the election was stolen. And that the Democrats will do Anything to keep Trump from being in office again. What else do you need to know? They are enemies of the people and authoritarian creeps.
In addition, if you actually knew what devolution is, if Trump had actually implemented it, he would, by definition, not be Commander in Chief, because those powers would have devolved to other people. It just goes to show that you don’t know what you are talking about.
That's not what I said. That's what other people are saying, but that's not what I said. I know devolution and its process. And I know that Trump would not be Commander-in-Chief because he would be the president, for one, And devolution doesn't just relate to succession of power, but also related to functionality. But again, what do I know? My point is, there's only certain individuals that can have opinions. I mean, look at you. Look at your initial comment. Look at the divide this is causing. You don't see that? The lengths that people go to to defend liars is just astonishing to me. Go through any one of my articles, show me where I'm lying. I clearly say when im giving opinion. All's I'm doing is sticking up for the Constitution, the rule of law, and my country's founding principles that these theories are decaying, and eroding, and destroying, and dividing us. So, yeah, that's cool.
I am responding to you trying to tear down your allies. I don’t care whether or not it’s your cup of tea. MAGA is a big tent. But you are the one on attack here, not me. From the things you have said, it looks like you are talking about Derick Johnson’s irresponsible hogwash and just spreading it around onto people who do actual research and back up their limited claims with documents, circumstantial evidence and a line of reasoning. It only goes so far and it’s not enough to know for sure. I hold it as a possibility. That’s all.
Lies and false narratives are not our allies; they are story weapons designed to separate "We the People" from our founding principles. The continuity of government would not be initiated in secret—it’s not designed that way, and it's concerning that people aren’t looking into the national continuity policy. Derek Johnson’s promotion of military occupancy is particularly troublesome and un-American. The idea of secret tribunals is equally un-American.
I understand we face severe corruption, and the current situation with Biden raises questions—he doesn't look the same, and I can't argue that. What I can say is that there is a regime in power, but it’s not the military’s role to change that. There’s no legal mechanism for such action. "We the People" have to take responsibility for reclaiming our country.
My point has always been that these distracting narratives prevent us from doing what needs to be done. Do you realize how organized the Democrats are? People are too comfortable when they shouldn’t be. Trump needs our efforts now, not people waiting for something that’s not going to happen—and I know this for a fact. I’m a retired Navy special operations officer with over 15 years of TSSCI clearance. I’ve studied these policies and programs, and I've written about them for almost two years.
For two years, I’ve been attacked for presenting evidence that’s right in front of everyone. I can show you how Presidential Emergency Action Documents (PEADs) cannot be executed in secret, explain the continuity policy, and demonstrate how the military’s role in national continuity is limited to defending homeland security in the event of a catastrophe.
Do you know how Democrats won the last election? Yes, they cheated, but how, and why couldn’t we stop it? There were plenty of legal cases challenging what we all know to be true, so why didn’t they succeed? Is our entire judicial system corrupt? I don’t think so. The Democrats were able to cheat because they have a strong grassroots strategy. They maneuver quickly to counter election fraud claims, and that’s exactly what they did. They passed laws that are morally wrong, stacked the odds in their favor, and were on the ground, reacting swiftly to all claims against them. That’s how they’re winning—by exploiting divisions on the ground level, which is a weak point for the Republican Party.
The Republican strength lies in centralized national strategy, proven by recent Supreme Court rulings. But the Democrats dominate the grassroots level, as evidenced by the 2020 election.
I agree. The argument that the election was stolen in a coup seems a good reason to do COG silently because trying to stop it on the spot would cause a civil war. They had way too much control over the media at that time. I don!t know if that’s what happened, but if you look at the narrative from 2020 through 2025, the theory maps well.
Derek Johnson is not part of Badlands Media. It’s not aimed at fracturing Trump’s base. They are very pro Trump and Pro MAGA. I see it as MAGA for intellectuals. It’s got a lot of Q in it too. I don’t see it as a bad thing for MAGA or for Trump. They fully admit they are working at Narrative warfare and that actual events may not be the same as stories told on either side They are focused not on breaking MAGA, but rather on breaking globalist/communist/ uniparty/unipolar narratives that are focused on bringing about the Great Reset. Instead , the counter narrative is about the Great Awakening and a new golden age for America and the world based not on unipolar control, but instead a sovereign alliance of nations forming a multipolar world based on sovereignty and freedom. It’s a much brighter future than anything the WEF has cooked up for us.
I'm fully aware that Derek Johnson is not part of Badlands Media and in my opinion it is aimed at fracturing Trump's base. What do you think is going to happen when all this comes to light? When people realize that Trump wasn't the commander-in-chief. That Trump didn't devolve the government. There's only one solution and it's not the military, it's we the people. That's the Great Awakening. The Great Awakening does not involve military tribunals. That's a lie. It doesn't involve some secret military occupancy. That's a lie. It doesn't include Trump devolving the government and somehow he's still secretly in charge. That is a lie. But hey, who am I?
I’ve been following the Badlands News Brief for months, because they usually bring up the interesting news, but I have found their takes sometimes to be a little out there. Take the Sovereign Alliance for example. This is a group of nations that could give two hoots about human rights, forming an alliance of decentralized, multi-lateral alliances? Please. They may join forces to bring down the US, but they’ll be fighting each other over our dead bodies. Not to mention with all the saber rattling against the WEF, they’re still in bed with them (namely China). It never made sense to me. Their (Badlands) takes are very clever, hiding incongruous facts with conjecture. Thank you for confirming my doubts. I was starting to question my spidey sense. MoveOn being the source makes perfect sense- with all the anti-Israel takes. Israel is the blind spot.
It’s ok if it’s not your cup of tea. No one is forcing you to watch it. But personally I would much rather watch people who encourage me to think for myself and to know that that everyone has an axe to grind and wants to program you. If someone makes a claim they should be able to back it up. This article here gives evidence they have a good business model, have shows that keep people engaged, good shows. And that they are getting their message out. Then they make a claim that Badlands is trying to fracture MAGA. There is no evidence presented for that claim. It’s no better than the “Orange man Bad” claim we have been pummeled with. This article is asking me to believe a claim with no evidence. They want to program me, not educate me.
I don’t think we have any way of knowing what Trump did or didn’t do. We can look at the evidence but in the end we can’t know for sure. I do believe the election was stolen. And that the Democrats will do Anything to keep Trump from being in office again. What else do you need to know? They are enemies of the people and authoritarian creeps.
In addition, if you actually knew what devolution is, if Trump had actually implemented it, he would, by definition, not be Commander in Chief, because those powers would have devolved to other people. It just goes to show that you don’t know what you are talking about.
That's not what I said. That's what other people are saying, but that's not what I said. I know devolution and its process. And I know that Trump would not be Commander-in-Chief because he would be the president, for one, And devolution doesn't just relate to succession of power, but also related to functionality. But again, what do I know? My point is, there's only certain individuals that can have opinions. I mean, look at you. Look at your initial comment. Look at the divide this is causing. You don't see that? The lengths that people go to to defend liars is just astonishing to me. Go through any one of my articles, show me where I'm lying. I clearly say when im giving opinion. All's I'm doing is sticking up for the Constitution, the rule of law, and my country's founding principles that these theories are decaying, and eroding, and destroying, and dividing us. So, yeah, that's cool.
I am responding to you trying to tear down your allies. I don’t care whether or not it’s your cup of tea. MAGA is a big tent. But you are the one on attack here, not me. From the things you have said, it looks like you are talking about Derick Johnson’s irresponsible hogwash and just spreading it around onto people who do actual research and back up their limited claims with documents, circumstantial evidence and a line of reasoning. It only goes so far and it’s not enough to know for sure. I hold it as a possibility. That’s all.
Lies and false narratives are not our allies; they are story weapons designed to separate "We the People" from our founding principles. The continuity of government would not be initiated in secret—it’s not designed that way, and it's concerning that people aren’t looking into the national continuity policy. Derek Johnson’s promotion of military occupancy is particularly troublesome and un-American. The idea of secret tribunals is equally un-American.
I understand we face severe corruption, and the current situation with Biden raises questions—he doesn't look the same, and I can't argue that. What I can say is that there is a regime in power, but it’s not the military’s role to change that. There’s no legal mechanism for such action. "We the People" have to take responsibility for reclaiming our country.
My point has always been that these distracting narratives prevent us from doing what needs to be done. Do you realize how organized the Democrats are? People are too comfortable when they shouldn’t be. Trump needs our efforts now, not people waiting for something that’s not going to happen—and I know this for a fact. I’m a retired Navy special operations officer with over 15 years of TSSCI clearance. I’ve studied these policies and programs, and I've written about them for almost two years.
For two years, I’ve been attacked for presenting evidence that’s right in front of everyone. I can show you how Presidential Emergency Action Documents (PEADs) cannot be executed in secret, explain the continuity policy, and demonstrate how the military’s role in national continuity is limited to defending homeland security in the event of a catastrophe.
Do you know how Democrats won the last election? Yes, they cheated, but how, and why couldn’t we stop it? There were plenty of legal cases challenging what we all know to be true, so why didn’t they succeed? Is our entire judicial system corrupt? I don’t think so. The Democrats were able to cheat because they have a strong grassroots strategy. They maneuver quickly to counter election fraud claims, and that’s exactly what they did. They passed laws that are morally wrong, stacked the odds in their favor, and were on the ground, reacting swiftly to all claims against them. That’s how they’re winning—by exploiting divisions on the ground level, which is a weak point for the Republican Party.
The Republican strength lies in centralized national strategy, proven by recent Supreme Court rulings. But the Democrats dominate the grassroots level, as evidenced by the 2020 election.
I agree. The argument that the election was stolen in a coup seems a good reason to do COG silently because trying to stop it on the spot would cause a civil war. They had way too much control over the media at that time. I don!t know if that’s what happened, but if you look at the narrative from 2020 through 2025, the theory maps well.