Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mary W Maxwell's avatar

"Both get paid per child, per unit of time. Both stop getting paid when a child goes home.

This fact needs to be present in the law-making. It is generally called "conflict of interest."

Thank you for such thorough research. See Dee McLachlan's book "The Child Protection Racket" as to how there is something similar in Australia, tho not privatised. See also my books "Society Is the Authority" and "Reunion: Judging the Family Court." This stuff must stop NOW.

Jill G.'s avatar

I don't know which situation would be worse. Paying them to keep these kids in the system or reversing that and incentivising them to send them back to "parents" that probably had no business having them in the first place. Sounds like a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation.

No posts

Ready for more?